2023
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1036882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction with 3D-printed prostheses after type I + II + III internal hemipelvectomy: Finite element analysis and preliminary outcomes

Abstract: Background: Prosthetic reconstruction after type I + II+ III internal hemipelvectomy remains challenging due to the lack of osseointegration and presence of giant shear force at the sacroiliac joint. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the novel 3D-printed, custom-made prosthesis with pedicle screw–rod system and sacral tray using finite element analysis.Methods: Four models that included one intact pelvis were established for validation. Forces of 500 N and 2,000 N were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies focused on surgical technique and prosthesis design in periacetabular defect reconstruction and reported reasonable clinical and function outcomes [ 28 32 ]. However, for tumor resection without ilium preservation, fixing the prosthesis to the sacrum is surgical difficult because the flat surface of the sacroiliac joint is vulnerable to shear loading [ 11 ]. Despite the utilization of multiple screw fixation could achieve primary stability, long-term non-integration between the implant and host bone may result in a high incidence of reconstruction failure [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies focused on surgical technique and prosthesis design in periacetabular defect reconstruction and reported reasonable clinical and function outcomes [ 28 32 ]. However, for tumor resection without ilium preservation, fixing the prosthesis to the sacrum is surgical difficult because the flat surface of the sacroiliac joint is vulnerable to shear loading [ 11 ]. Despite the utilization of multiple screw fixation could achieve primary stability, long-term non-integration between the implant and host bone may result in a high incidence of reconstruction failure [ 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, several prostheses have been developed for pelvic reconstruction, such as saddle prosthesis [ 5 , 6 ], ice cream cone prosthesis [ 7 , 8 ], and modular hemipelvis prosthesis [ 1 , 9 , 10 ]. However, when the ilium and acetabulum are completely removed, the saddle prosthesis and ice cream cone prosthesis cannot be fitted and fixed, which requires sufficient bone stock of the residual ilium for implant anchorage [ 11 , 12 ]. In this situation, modular hemipelvis prosthesis has gained popularity for pelvic reconstruction due to its flexible features in surgery [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%