2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.479902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction using optimal spatially variant kernel for B-mode ultrasound imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…T is the vector of scatterer amplitudes. This model has been used in B-mode (2-dimensional) [4][5][6][7][8][9], A-mode (1-dimensional) [16,17], and 3-dimensional [18] ultrasound imaging.…”
Section: Model-based Imaging and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T is the vector of scatterer amplitudes. This model has been used in B-mode (2-dimensional) [4][5][6][7][8][9], A-mode (1-dimensional) [16,17], and 3-dimensional [18] ultrasound imaging.…”
Section: Model-based Imaging and Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, real-world inspected objects easily break this assumption and many scatteres may be located off-grid. Many previous studies with model-based algorithms for ultrasound imaging, including but not limited to [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], have reported that resolution and contrast are substantially improved in comparison to delay-and-sum (DAS) algorithms when data comes from simulations with scatterers…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mechanically scanned B-scans, examples of this class of methods can be found in [2] in which linear minimum mean squared error (MMSE) was used to estimate the scatter map. A similar method based on singular value decomposition (SVD) regularization is found in [3]. One disadvantage of the methods is that the computation time is typically much larger than for SAFT processing, often limiting their use only to applications without real-time constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of the methods is that the computation time is typically much larger than for SAFT processing, often limiting their use only to applications without real-time constraints. Linear methods as those in [2] and [3] are best adapted to objects containing diffuse scatterers, with a Gaussian distribution modeling the amplitudes of these. In many application, particularly in nondestructive testing (NDT), the images are better described by a collection of a few but relatively strong contribution, for instance, indicating small cracks or material inclusions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inverse problem approaches 3 and regularization techniques, such as truncated singular value decomposition (TSVD) , 4 total variation , 5 total least squares 6 and others , 7 have already been used in acoustical imaging and their effectiveness have been explored to a limited extent. It is of special importance to compare the performance of this class of techniques with that which can be obtained using conventional acoustic imaging methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%