“…The global inventory and the relative contribution of these sources in the environment is still to be understood and some works have been involved in this effort (Casacuberta et al, 2014;Sakaguchi et al, 2009) .The natural 236 U/ 238 U ratios in the pre-anthropogenic environment range from 10 -14 to 10 -10 , the typical value of the 236 U/ 238 U ratio for U-ores ranges between 10 -12 and 10 -10 (Steier et al, 2008;Wilcken et al, 2008). Areas influenced by anthropogenic 236 U display 236 U/ 238 U ratio values greater than 10 -9 : from 10 -6 to more than 10 -3 near the Chernobyl damaged NPP (Boulyga and Becker, 2001;Hotchkis et al, 2000;Mironov et al, 2002), from 10 -8 to 10 -6 near the Fukushima one (Jaegler et al, 2019;Sakaguchi et al, 2014;Shinonaga et al, 2014;Yang et al, 2019Yang et al, , 2016, from 10 -6 to 10 -5 in the sediments from the Irish Sea impacted by the Sellafield reprocessing plant (Hotchkis et al, 2000;Ketterer et al, 2003;Marsden et al, 2001;Srncik et al, 2011a) and about 10 -9 to 10 -6 in areas affected by the global fallout from past nuclear testing as is the case in the northern hemisphere (Quinto et al, 2013(Quinto et al, , 2009Sakaguchi et al, 2010Sakaguchi et al, , 2009Shao et al, 2019;Srncik et al, 2011b). Moreover, the 236 U/ 238 U isotopic ratio was widely used to trace water masses in oceans (Casacuberta et al, 2014;Christl et al, 2015;Sakaguchi et al, 2012).…”