2016
DOI: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/11/115016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of two constant coefficients in linear anisotropic diffusion model

Abstract: Let be a complex Hilbert space and and be nonnegative and selfadjoint operators. We study the inverse problem consisting in the identification of the function and two constants α, (diffusion coefficients) that fulfill the initial-value problem and the additional conditions Under suitable assumptions on the operators A and B, and on the data and , we shall construct a solution and prove its uniqueness and continuous dependence on the data. Applications are considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We subsume this result in the next Lemma 2.2. For all admissible x ∈ H and all (α Such a condition is in fact implying the same conclusion of Lemma 2.2, and this can be proven exactly like in [14,Lemma 2.4]. However, in that case the solutions are forced to be classical, meanwhile the admissibility assumptions we are now proposing allow the initial datum to range in a larger set, so that here the solutions may also be of weak type.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We subsume this result in the next Lemma 2.2. For all admissible x ∈ H and all (α Such a condition is in fact implying the same conclusion of Lemma 2.2, and this can be proven exactly like in [14,Lemma 2.4]. However, in that case the solutions are forced to be classical, meanwhile the admissibility assumptions we are now proposing allow the initial datum to range in a larger set, so that here the solutions may also be of weak type.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…are linearly independent in H. As a matter of fact, like in the case n = 2 (cf. [14]), it is not difficult to realize that such a condition is strictly necessary for proving our result. In fact, without losing of generality, suppose…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations