2017
DOI: 10.1121/1.4974861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of the forehead acoustic properties in an Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis), with investigation on the responses of soft tissue sound velocity to temperature

Abstract: Computed tomography (CT) imaging and ultrasound experimental measurements were combined to reconstruct the acoustic properties (density, velocity, and impedance) of the head from a deceased Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin (Sousa chinensis). The authors extracted 42 soft forehead tissue samples to estimate the sound velocity and density properties at room temperature, 25.0  °C. Hounsfield Units (HUs) of the samples were read from CT scans. Linear relationships between the tissues' HUs and velocity, and HUs and de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, temperature is also a factor that affects sound velocity, and thereby the capacity of focusing sound for tissues. Sound velocities of soft tissues and lipids extracted from melon in odontocete forehead decrease with increasing temperature (Blomberg and Jensen, 1976;Litchfield et al, 1979;Goold et al, 1996;Goold and Clarke, 2000;Song et al, 2017), which is consistent with the results of our study (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, temperature is also a factor that affects sound velocity, and thereby the capacity of focusing sound for tissues. Sound velocities of soft tissues and lipids extracted from melon in odontocete forehead decrease with increasing temperature (Blomberg and Jensen, 1976;Litchfield et al, 1979;Goold et al, 1996;Goold and Clarke, 2000;Song et al, 2017), which is consistent with the results of our study (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This enabled us to compare sound velocities of different tissue types and investigate the acoustic function of forehead tissues in vivo. The corrected sound velocity of one melon sample in 1077.6 m/s is much less than that in previous studies (Blomberg and Jensen, 1976;Litchfield et al, 1979;Goold et al, 1996;Goold and Clarke, 2000;Soldevilla et al, 2005;Song et al, 2017). Sound velocity and density in samples composed of melon, muscle, or connective tissue of the short-finned pilot whale are shown in Table III with different temperatures, together with those in previously investigated species, such as Cuvier's beaked whale (Soldevilla et al, 2005), Yangtze finless porpoise (Wei et al, 2015), and pygmy sperm whale (Song et al, 2015).…”
Section: B Temperature and Sound Velocitymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such potential effect on tissue properties would add some extent of uncertainty to the model predictions, in order to quantify the uncertainty in the model and demonstrate how much the model output would have changed with potential range of sound velocity, the sound velocity of the melon was calculated at 23 C, 27 C, 32 C, 37 C according to the relationship between temperature and sound velocity measured by Song et al (2017). In the study by Song et al (2017), the relationship between the soft tissue's sound velocity and temperature demonstrated the nonlinearity of responses to temperature. The distribution of sound velocity of the melon at 23 C, 27 C, 32 C, 37 C can be estimated.…”
Section: Results and Dicussionsmentioning
confidence: 99%