2007
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of solar total irradiance since 1700 from the surface magnetic flux

Abstract: Context. Total solar irradiance changes by about 0.1% between solar activity maximum and minimum. Accurate measurements of this quantity are only available since 1978 and do not provide information on longer-term secular trends. Aims. In order to reliably evaluate the Sun's role in recent global climate change, longer time series are, however, needed. They can only be assessed with the help of suitable models. Methods. The total solar irradiance is reconstructed from the end of the Maunder minimum to the prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

26
359
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(93 reference statements)
26
359
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It must always be remembered that sunspot numbers have applications only because they are an approximate proxy indicator of the total magnetic flux threading the photosphere and hence can be used to estimate and reconstruct terrestrial influences such as the received shortwave Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) and UV irradiance (Krivova, Balmaceda, and Solanki, 2007;Krivova et al, 2009, respectively), the open solar magnetic flux (Solanki, Schüssler, and Fligge, 2000;Lockwood and Owens, 2014a), and hence also the near-Earth solar-wind speed (Lockwood and Owens, 2014b), mass flux (Webb and Howard, 1994), and interplanetary magnetic-field strength (Lockwood and Owens, 2014a). Sunspot numbers also provide an indication of the occurrence frequency of transient events, in particular coronal mass ejections (Webb and Howard, 1994;Owens and Lockwood, 2012), and the phase of the decadal-scale sunspot cycle is used to quantify the tilt of the heliospheric current sheet (Altschuler and Newkirk, 1969;Owens and Lockwood, 2012) and hence the occurrence of fast solar-wind streams and co-rotating interaction regions (Smith and Wolf, 1976;Gazis, 1996).…”
Section: Definitions Of Sunspot Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must always be remembered that sunspot numbers have applications only because they are an approximate proxy indicator of the total magnetic flux threading the photosphere and hence can be used to estimate and reconstruct terrestrial influences such as the received shortwave Total Solar Irradiance (TSI) and UV irradiance (Krivova, Balmaceda, and Solanki, 2007;Krivova et al, 2009, respectively), the open solar magnetic flux (Solanki, Schüssler, and Fligge, 2000;Lockwood and Owens, 2014a), and hence also the near-Earth solar-wind speed (Lockwood and Owens, 2014b), mass flux (Webb and Howard, 1994), and interplanetary magnetic-field strength (Lockwood and Owens, 2014a). Sunspot numbers also provide an indication of the occurrence frequency of transient events, in particular coronal mass ejections (Webb and Howard, 1994;Owens and Lockwood, 2012), and the phase of the decadal-scale sunspot cycle is used to quantify the tilt of the heliospheric current sheet (Altschuler and Newkirk, 1969;Owens and Lockwood, 2012) and hence the occurrence of fast solar-wind streams and co-rotating interaction regions (Smith and Wolf, 1976;Gazis, 1996).…”
Section: Definitions Of Sunspot Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of more recent forcing reconstructions (e.g., Krivova et al 2007;Gao et al 2008;Pongratz et al 2009) or simulations and models in the Coupled Model Intercomparisons Project phase 5/Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP5/PMIP3) (Taylor et al 2012) might improve the model-data comparison but would not be expected to have an impact on the validation of the reconstruction technique performed here.…”
Section: Model Description and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In sections 3-8 we test these hypotheses by directly comparing the Nimbus7/ERB data sets versus alternative solar data and proxy models. In this process we will study in details the TSI proxy models of Krivova et al (2007) Figure 3. In Appendix A Hoyt (the head of the NASA Nimbus7/ERB science team) explains the accuracy of the ERB record during the ACRIM Gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%