2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of sea-surface temperatures from assemblages of planktonic foraminifera: multi-technique approach based on geographically constrained calibration data sets and its application to glacial Atlantic and Pacific Oceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

36
375
0
23

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 419 publications
(454 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
36
375
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The reconstructions of the MARGO project [Kucera et al, 2005] provide more recent reconstructions of Atlantic SSTs at the LGM, suggesting the CLIMAP values (and our modeled values) are too cold in the northern North Atlantic and Nordic Seas. The CLIMAP LGM time slice has not been precisely defined and possibly includes Heinrich events, while the MARGO data is more accurately defined as from the 19-23 ka BP period, and therefore excludes any influence of Heinrich events.…”
Section: Climate Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reconstructions of the MARGO project [Kucera et al, 2005] provide more recent reconstructions of Atlantic SSTs at the LGM, suggesting the CLIMAP values (and our modeled values) are too cold in the northern North Atlantic and Nordic Seas. The CLIMAP LGM time slice has not been precisely defined and possibly includes Heinrich events, while the MARGO data is more accurately defined as from the 19-23 ka BP period, and therefore excludes any influence of Heinrich events.…”
Section: Climate Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, the winter limits of near freezing ocean surface temperatures in the model between 40-50°N are still further south than in the MARGO reconstructions. The modeled sea ice distribution produces sea ice all year round in the Nordic Seas, while this area is thought to have been seasonally ice-free [Pflaumann et al, 2003;Kucera et al, 2005], which also indicates our model is too cold in the northern North Atlantic. Other coupled atmosphere-ocean models from the PMIP project have similar problems obtaining LGM-PD temperature anomalies similar to those of MARGO [Kageyama et al, 2006].…”
Section: Climate Modelmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Records are compared from 26 sites ( Figure 1, Table 1) each of which is of a resolution appropriate for the detection of orbital variability and have astronomically calibrated age models. The SST records have been generated using the alkenone-derived proxy, U K 37 ' (Brassell et al, 1986;Müller et al, 1998;Prahl et al, 1988), Mg/Ca ratios in planktonic foraminifera Lea et al, 1999;Lea et al, 2000), or transfer function outputs from planktonic foraminifera assemblages (Imbrie and Kipp, 1971;Kucera et al, 2005;Vincent and Berger, 1981).…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfer functions seek to quantify the environmental variables that determine the assemblages of planktonic foraminifera, including SST, salinity and thermocline depth (Imbrie and Kipp, 1971;Jian et al, 2000;Kucera et al, 2005). Core-top calibrations are the preferred method of transfer function generation, as they incorporate temporal and spatial variability in production and diagenetic impacts upon initial sedimentation (Kucera et al, 2005).…”
Section: Transfer Functions In Planktonic Foraminiferamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reconstruct SSTs at Sites 975 and 958 and their Holocene reference cores (MD95-2043 and 658, respectively) a combined set of 279 samples from the Mediterranean Sea (Kucera et al, 2005 and references therein) and from the Iberian margin (Salgueiro et al, 2008) was added to the aforementioned data base. To reach consistency between foraminiferal counts produced by different researchers pink and white forms of Globigerinoides ruber, as well as Globigerinoides sacculifer and Globigerinoides trilobus, were grouped together.…”
Section: Planktic Foraminiferal Census Counts and Foraminiferal Sst Cmentioning
confidence: 99%