Reconstruction of portal vein and superior mesenteric vein after extensive resection for pancreatic cancer

Kim, Suh Min; Min, Seung-Kee; Park, Daedo; Min, Seok-Ki; Jang, Jin–Young; Kim, Sun‐Whe; Ha, Jong‐Won; Kim, Sang Joon

doi:10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.346

Cited by 21 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 19 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Isolated vein involvement is not a contraindication to resection, with comparable short and long-term outcomes comparable to those of a standard resection [63]. Techniques that can be used for reconstruction of the PV or SMV are wedge resection with venoplasty, end-to-end anastomosis (Figure 3), patches or vein interposition grafts [64,65]. Direct end-to-end anastomosis of the PV system is safe, but when tension-free anastomosis cannot be guaranteed; generally, in cases requiring ≥3 cm of SMV/PV resection, venous autografting may decrease the likelihood of anastomotic stenosis [66].…”

Section: Surgical Treatment: Recent Trends and Advancementsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Pancreatic Cancer: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pancreatic cancer is one of our most lethal malignancies. Despite substantial improvements in the survival rates for other major cancer forms, pancreatic cancer survival rates have remained relatively unchanged since the 1960s. Pancreatic cancer is usually detected at an advanced stage and most treatment regimens are ineffective, contributing to the poor overall prognosis. Herein, we review the current understanding of pancreatic cancer, focusing on central aspects of disease management from radiology, surgery and pathology to oncology. Historical remarks & present stateThe first known description of pancreatic cancer is attributed to Giovanni Battista Morgagni in his 1761 publication 'de Sedibus Et Causis Morborum Per Anatomen Indagatis Libri Quinque' [1]. However, the lack of a microscopic evaluation makes the true diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma uncertain. The next important advancement in our understanding of pancreatic cancer did not come until 1858, when Jacob Mendez Da Costa revisited Morgagni's original work and also described the first microscopic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, manifesting pancreatic cancer as a true disease entity [2].The history of pancreatic surgery is fairly recent and involves a combination of brave surgical pioneers, the development of surgical anesthesia and modern aseptic techniques. Some landmarks in the history of pancreatic surgery deserve to be mentioned. The first reported attempt at a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed in 1898 by the Italian surgeon Alessandro Codivilla for a tumor involving the head of the pancreas [3]; however, the patient did not survive the postoperative period. In the same year, William Stewart Halsted from Johns Hopkins Hospital performed the first successful resection for ampullary cancer by excising portions of the duodenum and the pancreas [4]. The first successful pancreaticoduodenectomy is credited to the German surgeon Walther Carl Eduard Kausch, as part of a two-stage procedure [5]. In 1914, Georg Hirschel performed the first successful pancreaticoduodenectomy in one stage [6] and then in 1935, Allen Oldfather Whipple presented the results of a two-stage procedure involving the resection of the head of the pancreas and duodenum for ampullary carcinoma at the annual meeting of the American Surgical Association, which renewed interest in pancreatic surgery [7]. During his career, Whipple performed 37 pancreaticoduodenectomies, with the procedure evolving into a one-stage technique [8,9], and 1964-1968 1969-1973 1974-1978 1979-1983 1984-1988 1989-1993 1994-1998 1999-2003 2004-2008 2009-2013 Period of diagnosis Whipple is generally credited with popularizing the operation that still bears his name. In 1937, Alexander Brunschwig performed the first successful pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma [10]. Today, with the concentration of experience in high-volume hospitals, pancreatic surgery has become a safe procedure associated with an operative mortality below 3% [11][12][13]. While major advances have been made ...

show abstract

Section: Surgical Treatment: Recent Trends and Advancementsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Pancreatic Cancer: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The evidence is that PSMV resection during PD is being performed more often, but there has not been a commensurate decrease in R1/2 margin rate. In some series, the overall R1 rate has increased with PSMV . The most common reason for R1/R2 was a positive SMA margin .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In some series, the overall R1 rate has increased with PSMV. 26,40,42,46,55,63 The most common reason for R1/R2 was a positive SMA margin. 6 Table 2 summarizes the literature that reports R1 rates with and without PSMV resection.…”

Section: Impact Of Venous Resection On Sma Marginmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Further training challenges will arise as laparoscopic and robotic PD incorporate the AFA. 31 2012 Korea 60 15 (25%) 0 (0%) --Wang et al 30 2012 Australia 212 51 (24%) 23 (45%) 50 (24%) 11 (22%) Aktekin et al 45 2013 Turkey 100 23 (23%) 5 (22%) 77 (77%) 2 (3%) Chen et al 68 2013 China 8 8 (100%) 1 (13%) --Gong et al 40 2013 China 566 119 (21%) 0 (0%) 447 (79%) 0 (0%) Kelly et al 47 2013 United States 492 70 (14%) 22 (32%) 422 (86%) 106 (25%) Kim et al 42 2013 South Korea 330 16 (5%) 0 (0%) --Kim et al 43 2013 Canada 249 66 (27%) 18 (27%) --Kurihara et al 41 2013 Japan 119 68 (57%) 33 (49%) --Menon et al 49 2013 United States 61 18 (30%) 1 (6%) 43 (70%) 4 (9%) Murakami et al 46 2013 Japan 125 61 (49%) 30 (49%) 64 (51%) 18 (28%) Chen et al 25 2014 China 1053 75 (7%) 5 (7%) --Delpero et al 6 2014 France 150 36 (24%) 28 (78%) 114 (76%) 63 (55%) Jahromi et al 33 2014…”

Section: Impact Of Training and Centralization On Margin Statusmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Artery first approach to pancreatoduodenectomy: current status

Pandanaboyana

Bell

Windsor

2015

ANZ Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A recent report investigated vascular outcomes based on the type of conduit used, however, the currently available data are limited. 10 The pros and cons of all available options are important to consider in deciding the most appropriate reconstructive option.…”

Section: Improvements In the Resolution Of Multidetector Computed Tommentioning

confidence: 99%