2021
DOI: 10.22467/jwmr.2020.01207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of Plantar Forefoot in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Comparative Study of Perforator Flaps and Random Flaps

Abstract: Background: Plastic and reconstructive surgeons consider a variety of options to salvage limbs of patients when operating on soft tissue defects of the plantar forefoot in diabetic foot ulcers. This study focuses on the efficacy and durability of perforator flaps compared to that of random flaps, when covering the plantar forefoot area in diabetic patients.<br/>Methods: From January 2011 to August 2020, we performed 49 plantar forefoot reconstructions to cover soft tissue defects in diabetes patients usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the procedure might only be performed for diabetic patients if there is a good vascular flow to the flap region. [12][13][14] The surgical scars in the presented case are easily concealed with footwear, leading to high patient satisfaction with the cosmetic and overall outcomes of the surgery. These factors suggest that medial plantar artery flaps should be considered a viable option for wound coverage in the heel region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, the procedure might only be performed for diabetic patients if there is a good vascular flow to the flap region. [12][13][14] The surgical scars in the presented case are easily concealed with footwear, leading to high patient satisfaction with the cosmetic and overall outcomes of the surgery. These factors suggest that medial plantar artery flaps should be considered a viable option for wound coverage in the heel region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%