2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2008.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of photorealistic 3D model of ceramic artefacts for interactive virtual exhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the color texture information obtained with our method can be used for further estimation of lighting influence [5,15,18,22], resulting in models with high fidelity reflectance properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, the color texture information obtained with our method can be used for further estimation of lighting influence [5,15,18,22], resulting in models with high fidelity reflectance properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the accuracy of geometric data from image matching often suffers from the uncertain correspondence of pixels of the stereo images especially for parts with little textural detail. For many digital cultural heritage applications, the most economical and practical way to digitize a complex model is to collect geometric data and texture data simultaneously with laser scanners (colored point clouds) or cameras (multi-view images) [9,10]. However, the registration of high quality images with complex 3D geometric models is a technical problem that still remains to be adequately solved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital heritage management has been a driving factor for 3D tools in archaeological documentation over the course of the last decade (Bruno et al 2010;Guidi et al 2004;Pavlidis et al 2007;Yastikli 2007). The use of shading and stippling in artifact illustration, as well as the creation of artifact squeezes and casts, has sought to add a level of three-dimensionality to artifact recording throughout the last century (Heath 2015;Rick and White 1974), while 3D scanning has provided a digital workflow (Andrea et al 2012;Chow and Chan 2009;Fowles et al 2003;Grün et al 2004;Zapassky et al 2006). It is clear that 3D solutions in archaeology are not new, yet the preoccupation with them over the last three years marks a paradigmatic shift where the archaeological community has consciously adopted and adapted 3D tools to address a host of issues.…”
Section: Back To the Third Dimension In Archaeological Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%