“…Here we would like to emphasize that even though the genome from Jatropha was sequenced and that there is also the possibility to apply automated tools to perform a bottom‐up reconstruction, it must be noted that we were interested in lipid metabolism for which there is no complete annotation and thus these approaches will not provide optimal results. We also checked other plant metabolic models of small (Schwender et al ., 2004, 2006; Junker et al ., 2007; Alonso et al ., 2007a,b; Williams et al ., 2008; Allen et al ., 2009; Lonien and Schwender, 2009; Alonso et al ., 2010, 2011; Kruger et al ., 2012; Allen and Young, 2013; Masakapalli et al ., 2013; Colombié et al ., 2015; Schwender et al ., 2015; Rossi et al ., 2017; Cocuron et al ., 2019) and medium size (Grafahrend‐Belau et al ., 2009; Pilalis et al ., 2011; Hay and Schwender, 2011a,b; Schwender and Hay, 2012; Grafahrend‐Belau et al ., 2013; Arnold and Nikoloski, 2014), besides the available genome‐scale models (GEMs) (Poolman et al ., 2009; Radrich et al ., 2010; Dal’Molin et al ., 2010; Saha et al ., 2011; Mintz‐Oron et al ., 2012; Poolman et al ., 2013; Monaco et al ., 2013; Simons et al ., 2014; Seaver et al ., 2015; Lakshmanan et al ., 2015; Yuan et al ., 2016; Bogart and Myers, 2016; Chatterjee et al ., 2017; Botero et al ., 2018; Pfau et al ., 2018; Shaw and Cheung, 2018; Moreira et al ., 2019), and found that most of the metabolic reconstructions of small and medium size have low levels of detail of the lipid network, since the lipid‐related reactions are lumped. The exception is the metabolic reconstruction for rapeseed (Hay and Schwender, 2011a,b), with a total of 572 reactions of which 187 are lipid‐related.…”