2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000096704.34065.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of Orbital Floor Fracture Using Solvent-Preserved Bone Graft

Abstract: The orbital floor is one of the most frequently damaged parts of the maxillofacial skeleton during facial trauma. Unfavorable aesthetic and functional outcomes are frequent when it is treated inadequately. The treatment consists of spanning the floor defect with a material that can provide structural support and restore the orbital volume. This material should also be biocompatible with the surrounding tissues and easily reshaped to fit the orbital floor. Although various autografts or synthetic materials have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Maxillofacial, ENT and plastic surgeons sometimes encounter clinical cases where orbital floors are destroyed by fractures (Bartkowski and Krzystkowa, 1982;Hayasaka et al, 1994;Schubert et al, 2002;Hughes et al, 2003;Kosaka et al, 2004;Lynham et al, 2004;Yavuzer et al, 2004;Buchel et al, 2005;Eppley, 2005) or are removed in advanced tumours (Cordeiro et al, 1998;Lee et al, 1999;Holmes and Hutchinson, 2001;Parmar et al, 2001). For these, the defects of the orbital floor have to be repaired to match its original shape as closely as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Maxillofacial, ENT and plastic surgeons sometimes encounter clinical cases where orbital floors are destroyed by fractures (Bartkowski and Krzystkowa, 1982;Hayasaka et al, 1994;Schubert et al, 2002;Hughes et al, 2003;Kosaka et al, 2004;Lynham et al, 2004;Yavuzer et al, 2004;Buchel et al, 2005;Eppley, 2005) or are removed in advanced tumours (Cordeiro et al, 1998;Lee et al, 1999;Holmes and Hutchinson, 2001;Parmar et al, 2001). For these, the defects of the orbital floor have to be repaired to match its original shape as closely as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, progress in biomaterial science has provided another option: bioabsorbable materials that consist of mainly poly-L-lactic acid and polyglycolic acid, which are absorbed slowly and simultaneously replaced by tissues. Although these materials might be adequate for small defects of the orbital floor, they are not suitable for volume-demanding defects [1,[10][11][12]. Inspite of substantial progress in the biomaterial science, autogenous bone remains the gold standard in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This material should also be biocompatible with the surrounding tissues and easily reshaped to fit the orbital floor. Although various autografts or synthetic materials have been used, there is still no consensus on the ideal reconstruction method of orbital floor defects [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,18] Various materials are used in reconstruction of the orbital floor, such as autogenic grafts (bone, cartilage, fascia, etc. ), [26][27][28][29][30][31] allogenic grafts, [32,33] and alloplastic materials (silicone, polytetrafluoroethylene, hydroxylapatite, porous polyethylene, titanium, and Vitallium mesh). [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] There are studies outlining their advantages, disadvantages and success rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%