2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of national distribution of indoor radon concentration in Russia using results of regional indoor radon measurement programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When extrapolating the obtained value of a life--long additional relative risk 0.14 per 100 Bq/m 3 to the conditions of the radon exposure in residential areas of Russia (mean radon concentration 48 Bq/m 3 [22]), the average ERR value will be 0.067. With this value of ERR, the contribution of radon to lung cancer morbidity and mortality from all causes is approximately 6.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When extrapolating the obtained value of a life--long additional relative risk 0.14 per 100 Bq/m 3 to the conditions of the radon exposure in residential areas of Russia (mean radon concentration 48 Bq/m 3 [22]), the average ERR value will be 0.067. With this value of ERR, the contribution of radon to lung cancer morbidity and mortality from all causes is approximately 6.3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to the estimations, the radon concentration lies in the range from 20 to 80 Bq/m 3 in most of the regions, and the average indoor radon concentration in Russia is 48 Bq/m 3 . In more detail, the approach to reconstruction of national distribution of indoor radon concentration in Russia is presented in [20]. The regional average radon concentrations are presented in Table 1 and their distribution is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only regional surveys were identified in 5 member states: Belgium (Cinelli et al, 2011; Poffijn et al, 1994; Tondeur et al, 1997; Zhu et al, 2001, 1998), Bulgaria (Ivanova et al, 2013), Cyprus (Anastasiou et al, 2003; Theodoulou et al, 2012), Germany (Kemski et al, 2004, 1996), Latvia (Dambis, 1996), Romania (Cucoş (Dinu) et al, 2017). Outside the EU, national surveys were conducted in Azerbaijan (Hoffmann et al, 2017), Belarus (Yaroshevich et al, 2012), Iceland (Jónsson et al, 2015), Macedonia (Stojanovska et al, 2012), Montenegro (Vukotic et al, 2018), Russia (Yarmoshenko et al, 2015), Serbia (Udovičić et al, 2016), Switzerland (Kropat et al, 2014), Ukraine (Pavlenko et al, 2014) and Norway (Jensen et al, 2004). Only regional surveys were identified for Albania (Bode Tushe et al, 2016), Armenia (IAEA, 2014), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Ćurguz et al, 2015; IAEA, 2014), Georgia (IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), 2014), Kazakhstan (Fyodorov et al, 2014), Moldova (Ursulean et al, 2013), and Turkey (Can et al, 2012; Köksal et al, 2004).…”
Section: Survey Design and Representativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum number of locations was selected in Malta national survey – 85 (Baluci et al, 2013) At the other end of the spectrum, radon measurements from more than 500,000 locations are available in UK (Daraktchieva et al, 2015; Miles et al, 2007, 2011). There are at least 5 countries besides UK with more than 50,000 measurement locations – Russia (Yarmoshenko et al, 2015), Czech Republic (Dubois et al, 2010), Switzerland (Kropat et al, 2014), Finland (Valmari et al, 2010) and Norway (Jensen et al, 2004).…”
Section: Survey Design and Representativenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation