2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00004-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of nasal defects using modified composite grafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides graft size, other factors have been described having an important influence on graft take: degree of contact between graft and recipient bed, quality of recipient site, and metabolic factors. 9 In 1956, Conley and Vonfraenkel reported on the principle of cooling composite nasal grafts to reduce graft metabolism to improve their take. 12 However, duration, quality, and quantity of cooling are practical factors, which still remain under-standardized until today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides graft size, other factors have been described having an important influence on graft take: degree of contact between graft and recipient bed, quality of recipient site, and metabolic factors. 9 In 1956, Conley and Vonfraenkel reported on the principle of cooling composite nasal grafts to reduce graft metabolism to improve their take. 12 However, duration, quality, and quantity of cooling are practical factors, which still remain under-standardized until today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative technical applications of the classical ''end-to-end'' type of union include a ''tongue-in-groove'' principle that was illustrated by Davenport and Bernard in 1959, 10 interlocking of cartilaginous pegs, 11 or the preparation of extended dermal pedicles that have at least twice the size of the transplant, as discussed by Chandawarkar et al in 2003. 9 A disadvantage of these methods is that a complex preparation of the recipient site is necessary with a wide dissection of the transplant pocket along the nasal dorsum, 9 limiting the size of the transplant to 2 cm, and increasing the risk for infection or scarring, which could compromise the final functional or cosmetic result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the defect in this case is known to be very unfavorable for the survival of composite grafts. Chandawarkar et al [29] in their experience with auricular composite grafting stated that at the columellar-lobular junction, alar rim and the soft triangle, partial composite graft loss is a rule rather than the exception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The forehead should be spoiled as little as possible in partial and total reconstruction of the nose. Nasal defects in certain areas such as the columellarlobular junction, the alar rim, and the soft triangle are cosmetically challenging to reconstruct (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%