2010
DOI: 10.1002/micr.20786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of lateral through and through oro‐mandibular defects following oncological resections

Abstract: Bone reconstruction of the lateral mandible is indicated whenever possible. In elderly or poor prognosis patients acceptable results can be achieved with free soft tissue flaps techniques. When the defect involves different structures of the oral cavity, the best results are provided by the association of two free flaps. Finally, the association of free and locoregional flaps is a good option for external coverage reconstruction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Our present results indicate that the iliac crest osteocutaneous flap by itself has a limited role in modern mandibular reconstruction. However, considering the many favorable properties of the iliac crest for mandibular reconstruction, including a natural curvature resembling that of the mandible, sufficient bone stock, and a concealable donor site, [10][11][12] the use of the flap in combination with another skin flap can be a useful option for selected patients. We believe that the skin island of the iliac crest flap should not be used for intraoral lining, unless adequate circulation of the skin island can be confirmed after inset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Our present results indicate that the iliac crest osteocutaneous flap by itself has a limited role in modern mandibular reconstruction. However, considering the many favorable properties of the iliac crest for mandibular reconstruction, including a natural curvature resembling that of the mandible, sufficient bone stock, and a concealable donor site, [10][11][12] the use of the flap in combination with another skin flap can be a useful option for selected patients. We believe that the skin island of the iliac crest flap should not be used for intraoral lining, unless adequate circulation of the skin island can be confirmed after inset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 When bone reconstruction is not indicated, we prefer a free ALT musculocutaneous flap, alone or in association with a titanium reconstructive plate. 26 In such cases, the muscular component of the flap plays a major role, it protects the plate with a large amount of well revascularized tissue, thereby preventing plate infections and exposure, while simultaneously providing bulky reconstruction of the defect and reducing the asymmetry of the oral cavity resulting from the mandibular resection. In the patients list reported here, any of the 12 plates used in association with the flap underwent exposure and esthetically, the bulk of the flap allowed an adequate facial contour restoration also when the flap was used alone (n 5 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the development of surgical techniques and prosthetic repair, defects in the facial structures lead to severe aesthetic and functional problems (1)(2)(3)(4). Uncontrollable and persistent loco-regional and distant recurrences with invasive disposition result in a low overall long-term survival rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%