2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2013.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of isolated mandibular bone defects with non-vascularized corticocancellous bone autograft and graft viability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
32
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional allografts and autografts have limitations such as immune rejection, disease transmission, malunion, and flap necrosis [1, 2]. Researchers are developing new alternatives to traditional methods for bone defect regeneration [3]. The development of artificial bone transplantation has been greatly facilitated by tissue engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional allografts and autografts have limitations such as immune rejection, disease transmission, malunion, and flap necrosis [1, 2]. Researchers are developing new alternatives to traditional methods for bone defect regeneration [3]. The development of artificial bone transplantation has been greatly facilitated by tissue engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While each has distinct advantages, these options are not without their shortcomings. Autografts, generally procured from the cranium, iliac crest, ribs, tibia and other areas are considered to be the gold standard in clinical care due to their osteoconductive and osteoinductive nature [ 1 2 ]. However, while this approach epitomizes the clinical dogma of replacing “like with like,” defect size can preclude this option due to the relative limited supply of available autologous tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 For a small range of bone defects (<4 cm), the clinical use of bone graft surgery for repair of bone defects may have a relatively good prognosis. For large bone defects (>4 cm), the most commonly used techniques at home and abroad include: 1) vascularized autologous bone grafts, 11 , 12 such as the use of vascularized free fibula grafts to repair large segments of bone defects from various causes, but the shortcomings include a high demand for the level of microsurgical techniques, inaccurate effects of vascular anastomosis, long time of creeping substitution for bone graft, and repairable bone defects limited by the length and diameter of the donor area, as well as multiple complications in the recipient area, making it not an ideal procedure for infected bone defects. 2) The technique of distraction osteogenesis 13 - 15 i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%