1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0764-4469(97)86933-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of human maxillary defects with nacre powder: histological evidence for bone regeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
83
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies (Atlan et al, 1997;Silve et al, 1992), as reviewed in Westbroek and Marin (1998) Shen et al (2006) have demonstrated the in vitro osteogenic activity of pearl. Hydroxyapatite can be formed on pearl surface in Simulated Body Fluid based on a dissolution-binding-precipitation mechanism.…”
Section: Biological Action Of Raw Nacrementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous studies (Atlan et al, 1997;Silve et al, 1992), as reviewed in Westbroek and Marin (1998) Shen et al (2006) have demonstrated the in vitro osteogenic activity of pearl. Hydroxyapatite can be formed on pearl surface in Simulated Body Fluid based on a dissolution-binding-precipitation mechanism.…”
Section: Biological Action Of Raw Nacrementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Over a period of 12 months, the nacre blocks show persistence without alteration of the implant shape. A complete sequence of osteogenesis resulted from direct contact between newly formed bone and the nacre, anchoring the nacre implant (Atlan et al, 1997). Furthermore, when nacre is implanted in bone, new bone formation occurs, without any inflammatory reaction and fibrous formation.…”
Section: Biological Action Of Raw Nacrementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mollusc shells, the aragonite and the protein matrix form a composite material (mineral matrix + organic matrix) called nacre. Taking into account that the mechanisms behind the construction of the different biomineralized tissues occur in similar fashion, it seems coherent to seek out materials that can substitute or induce the regeneration of bone tissue in other biomineralizing organisms, and this explains the attention given to corals and molluscs with shells 5,6,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] . Thus, this work has sought, through the gathering and comparison of the characteristics of clinical interest, to find in the residues from malacoculture the potential for obtaining an industrial input of low ecological/economic impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nacre and biogenic aragonite are two materials of 25 , without inflammation and/or fibrous formations. In vivo and in vitro studies indicate the nacre as a biocompatible, biodegradable and osteocondutive material, which may attract and activate bone marrow stem cells and osteoblasts; the same was observed in biogenic aragonite [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . The mechanical and tribological properties -as tensile, compression and bending strength, besides resistance to abrasion -of the nacre, comparatively better than that of pure aragonite, are due to its hierarchical structure of micrometric hexagonal tablets with mineral bridges and interlocking surfaces 36,[38][39][40][41][42] and cemented in organic matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nacre is able to form a tight bond of bone without soft and fibrous tissue formation. It is gradually and centripetally dissolved but not resorbed by cells because it is not porous [141,142].…”
Section: Biopolymer-bioceramicsmentioning
confidence: 99%