Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement

Abstract

Legal protection for the community to obtain rights and recovery of the situation is one of them taken by settling civil cases through the courts. During the times and the adjustment of existing conditions, the Supreme Court issued a responsive and progressive law with the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 so that the public could obtain essential justice based on the principles of fast, simple, and low-cost justice. The aims of this study are: (i) knowing the legal culture in the implementation of e-court as a reflection of the problems of law enforcement; and (ii) reconstruction of legal culture regarding case administration and court proceedings electronically. The author uses empirical juridical research methods. The results of the study show: (i) e-court based court legal culture is not yet optimal. Village communities seeking justice (non-advocates) at the Religious Courts and District Courts of Semarang Regency tend to prefer conventional registration and trial over e-courts; and (ii) the reconstruction of the legal culture community is carried out using e-court socialization education to all advocates, providing educational media to non-advocates, and providing information about administration and trials electronically through notification letters to the district head .Through this, it will create a legal culture that supports the implementation of e-court so that fair law enforcement can be achieved.

Legal Disruption and Sharia Arbitration: Navigating Change, Measuring Impact, and Fostering Innovation

“…Cooperation between religious courts and national Sharia arbitration institutions has proven effective in resolving Sharia economic disputes, providing a more comprehensive and efficient settlement process [10]. In the future, the development of electronic courts offers challenges and opportunities in the resolution of Islamic banking disputes, with the need for an effective and secure digital infrastructure to support the settlement process [11]. Overall, Sharia Arbitration has the potential to continue to respond to opportunities and challenges that arise in the era of disruption, providing more efficient solutions in resolving disputes in financial transactions following Sharia principles.…”

Pandemi Covid-19 As A Factor of Delays in The Execution of Court Decisions

“…25 John Rawls said that justice in a broad sense, namely lawfulness, is not only compliance with the law, but also the willingness to advance or encourage the common good which is considered a constitutive goal of law. 26 Justice must be upheld by law enforcement as fundamental to the application of the law 27 . In John Rawls's principle of justice, namely the Principle of greatest equal liberty (the principle of equal liberty as much as possible).…”