2018
DOI: 10.1002/micr.30345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of cranioplasty using the thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap: A case series

Abstract: Our data suggest that the TDAP may be employed in postcranioplasty reconstruction. The TDAP has more advantages compared to other flaps used in alloplastic reconstruction: a broad large surface, a long pedicle, and a thinner thickness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alloplastic implants are usually placed simultaneously with flap transfers (Chang et al, 2010; Scaglioni & Giunta, 2019). However, there are several significant disadvantages of a single‐stage approach, including an increased risk of implant loss due to flap failure, reduction of the benefits of healing when a two‐stage procedure is preformed, and decreased maximization of hair‐bearing skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alloplastic implants are usually placed simultaneously with flap transfers (Chang et al, 2010; Scaglioni & Giunta, 2019). However, there are several significant disadvantages of a single‐stage approach, including an increased risk of implant loss due to flap failure, reduction of the benefits of healing when a two‐stage procedure is preformed, and decreased maximization of hair‐bearing skin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the current literature surrounding concurrent soft tissue reconstruction with cranioplasty is limited to single institution cohort studies, case studies, and case reports. 18–23,35–37 In the present study, the majority of composite microvascular scalp reconstructions were with muscle flaps (56.3%, n = 18), followed by fasciocutaneous flaps (25%, n = 8) and pedicled myocutaneous/fasciocutaneous flaps (18.7%, n = 6). In our study, there was no statistically significant difference in overall complication between flap type (37.5% versus 15.6%, P = 0.89).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…To the best of our knowledge, there is a one case in the literature that reported the use of occipital artery as a recipient artery in scalp reconstruction. [ 20 ] In this study, a case with radiotherapy history, scalp defect was located in the parietooccipital area. After dissection, intimal damage in the ipsilateral occipital artery was found and anastomosis was performed to the contralateral occipital artery which was of good quality and caliber.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superficial temporal artery is the most commonly used recipient artery, then comes the facial artery and other vessels including superior thyroid, posterior auricular, lingual, transverse cervical, external and common carotid, maxillary, and occipital artery. [ 2 , 11 - 13 , 20 ] Even though the superficial temporal artery is the most preferred recipient artery, its small caliber and the intimal damage due to the previous surgeries or irradiation occasionally limit its usage. In these cases, facial artery is chosen as a second option for recipient artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%