2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of Ancestral Metabolic Enzymes Reveals Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Evolutionary Innovation through Gene Duplication

Abstract: Resurrection of ancient fungal maltase enzymes uncovers the molecular details of how repeated gene duplications allow the evolution of protein variants with different functions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
227
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
9
227
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting example is the evolution of the MALS family of a-glucosidases in S. cerevisiae and its close relatives (Voordeckers et al 2012). S. cerevisiae has seven closely related a-glucosidases (MAL12 and 32, IMA1 -5) with different substrate specificities.…”
Section: Predictions From and Supporting Evidence For The Iad Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interesting example is the evolution of the MALS family of a-glucosidases in S. cerevisiae and its close relatives (Voordeckers et al 2012). S. cerevisiae has seven closely related a-glucosidases (MAL12 and 32, IMA1 -5) with different substrate specificities.…”
Section: Predictions From and Supporting Evidence For The Iad Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASR uses a combination of phylogenetics, evolutionary theory, synthetic biology and protein biochemistry to infer the sequences of ancestral proteins and then characterise them in the laboratory. It has provided otherwise unobtainable insight into many evolutionary questions, such as ligand specificity in steroid hormone receptors (Bridgham et al 2006(Bridgham et al , 2009Eick et al 2012), spectral tuning in visual pigments (Chang et al 2002;Chinen et al 2005;Yokoyama et al 2008) and substrate specificity amongst fungal a-glucosidases (Voordeckers et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high-affinity sulfate transporter (SUL1) acts as a gene dosage, and the yeast a-glucosidase gene MALS family exhibits aspects of three classical models, such as gene dosage, neo-, and subfunctionalization (Perry et al 2007;Gresham et al 2008;Warringer et al 2011;Voordeckers et al 2012). This study clearly indicates that the copy number amplification of FLO11D also contributes to adaptation in a gene-dosage-dependent manner.…”
Section: Implications Of Flo11d Copy Number Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In humans, most CNVs overlapping genes are under purifying (negative) selection (Conrad et al 2010), but a handful of CNVs are thought to be under positive selection (Cooper et al 2007;Hurles et al 2010;Iskow et al 2012) such as AMY1 (Perry et al 2007). In yeast, there are several examples of how the (increased) copy number can provide a direct selective advantage (Gresham et al 2008;Voordeckers et al 2012).In nature, budding yeast exhibits a number of adaptive responses, such as filamentation, invasive growth, flocculation, and biofilm formation, to overcome a deleterious environment (Fidalgo et al 2006). The FLO (flocculation) gene family plays a central role in the mediation of these adaptive responses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%