2008
DOI: 10.1029/2007gl032933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of a magnetic flux rope from THEMIS observations

Abstract: [1] We investigate a magnetic flux rope (MFR) observed by THEMIS near the duskside magnetopause on 20 May 2007 using the reconstruction technique based on solving the Grad-Shafranov equation. The MFR has characteristics distinct from the adjacent magnetosheath and magnetosphere regions. In spite of these differences, the reconstruction result shows that the MFR is connected simultaneously with both the magnetosheath and the magnetosphere in terms of the magnetic vector potential characteristics. This result pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The GS reconstruction method is a data analysis tool that can be used to obtain information on the size, magnetic topology, orientation, and so forth of a 2‐D magnetohydrostatic structure [ Sonnerup and Guo , 1996; Hau and Sonnerup , 1999; Hu and Sonnerup , 2001, 2002, 2003; Hu et al , 2005; Hasegawa et al , 2005, 2006; Lui et al , 2008]. Recently, the applications have also been extended to the situation where substantial field‐aligned flow is present or the stream structure has strong perpendicular flow [ Sonnerup et al , 2006; Teh and Sonnerup , 2007; Eriksson et al , 2009].…”
Section: Grad–shafranov Streamline Reconstruction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GS reconstruction method is a data analysis tool that can be used to obtain information on the size, magnetic topology, orientation, and so forth of a 2‐D magnetohydrostatic structure [ Sonnerup and Guo , 1996; Hau and Sonnerup , 1999; Hu and Sonnerup , 2001, 2002, 2003; Hu et al , 2005; Hasegawa et al , 2005, 2006; Lui et al , 2008]. Recently, the applications have also been extended to the situation where substantial field‐aligned flow is present or the stream structure has strong perpendicular flow [ Sonnerup et al , 2006; Teh and Sonnerup , 2007; Eriksson et al , 2009].…”
Section: Grad–shafranov Streamline Reconstruction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spin period resolution of the plasma distribution functions, when combined with high resolution magnetic and electric field measurements, allows detailed studies of magnetopause structure. Early results published in a special issue of Geophysical Research Letters include: (1) multi-satellite observations of asymmetric reconnection demonstrating that the Hall electric fields are significant only on the magnetospheric side of the magnetopause (Mozer et al 2008), (2) interactions of kinetic Alfven waves with particles at the magnetopause (Chaston et al 2008), (3) multi-satellite observations of a crater flux transfer event (FTE) that is used to recreate the 2-D structure of the magnetopause , and (4) additional analyses of FTE structure (Lui et al 2008;Liu et al 2008).…”
Section: Low Latitude Boundary Layer During Northward Imfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reconstruction of two‐dimensional (2‐D), time‐independent plasma/field structures from data taken by a single spacecraft, past which the structure is moving, has been shown to be possible for cases governed by an equation of the Grad‐Shafranov (GS) type [ Sonnerup and Guo , 1996; Hau and Sonnerup , 1999; Hu and Sonnerup , 2001, 2003; Sonnerup et al , 2004, 2006; Hasegawa et al , 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007a, 2007b; Teh et al , 2007; Lui et al , 2008a, 2008b]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that reconstruction is not limited to structures governed by a GS equation: It can in reality proceed directly from the 2‐D, ideal MHD equations [ Sonnerup and Teh , 2008], which has enabled the reconstruction of reconnection geometries in the frame of reference anchored in the X‐line [ Teh and Sonnerup , 2008; Teh et al , 2009] instead of in the deHoffmann‐Teller (HT) frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%