2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction After Tumor Resection in the Growing Child

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limb salvage in skeletally immature children is challenging, with the greatest difficulty associated with resection of the open physis. Sacrifice of major growth plates during resection and fixed‐length reconstruction of a limb in a skeletally immature child with osteosarcoma usually result in significant limb‐length inequality as growth progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Limb salvage in skeletally immature children is challenging, with the greatest difficulty associated with resection of the open physis. Sacrifice of major growth plates during resection and fixed‐length reconstruction of a limb in a skeletally immature child with osteosarcoma usually result in significant limb‐length inequality as growth progress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical options have shifted from amputation to limb salvage. Reconstruction strategies for this specific population include rotationplasty, megaprosthesis implantation with expandable mechanism or fixed length, allograft, and staged distraction osteogenesis. Rotationplasty and expandable endoprosthesis have been successfully used to treat skeletally immature patients with osteosarcoma of the distal femur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In third-world countries, where chemotherapy lacks funding and amputation has negative perceptions, it can be used as a tool to educate patients [32]. In skeletally immature patients prognostic estimates can help guide whether a patient is suitable for a growing prosthesis, an invasive growing prosthesis, allograft reconstruction, or conventional limb salvage with an endoprosthesis [20,39]. A hypothetical example would be where the clinician decides to neglect the growth potential of a child who has a poor prognosis and opts for an endoprosthesis that will provide short-term function and quality of life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%