Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics 2005
DOI: 10.1002/047001153x.g404208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing vertebrate phylogenetic trees

Abstract: Within the last three decades, the methodology underlying vertebrate phylogenetic analysis, including the dating of speciation events, has grown from the use of morphological characters in living organisms and fossils to an increased emphasis on molecular phylogenetics. Here, we use a selected set of examples to give a brief survey of how these approaches have been used together to resolve some interesting and difficult questions regarding both lower‐ and higher‐level relationships of vertebrate species.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the references given by the instructor, students were required to perform a literature search and conduct a literature review in their reports. Figure 1 shows that the topology of the reconstructed tree with CFTR protein sequences is in general agreement with the currently accepted view of the organismal phylogeny of vertebrate species (Kumar and Filipski 2005). The tree displays the general patterns of relationships among fish, amphibians, birds, and mammals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition to the references given by the instructor, students were required to perform a literature search and conduct a literature review in their reports. Figure 1 shows that the topology of the reconstructed tree with CFTR protein sequences is in general agreement with the currently accepted view of the organismal phylogeny of vertebrate species (Kumar and Filipski 2005). The tree displays the general patterns of relationships among fish, amphibians, birds, and mammals.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%