1999
DOI: 10.21314/jcf.1999.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the unknown local volatility function

Abstract: Abstract. Using market European option prices, a method for computing a smooth local volatility function in a 1-factor continuous diffusion model is proposed. Smoothness is introduced to facilitate accurate approximation of the true local volatility function from a finite set of observation data. It is emphasized that accurately approximating the true local volatility function is crucial in hedging even simple European options, and pricing exotic options. A spline functional approach is used: the local volatil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
113
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
113
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Dupire's derivation essentially shows that any smile surface can be fitted by local volatility provided the model is non parametric, and it basically provides the non parametric formula. On the other hand, methods consisting in parameterizing the local volatility surface a priori (through spline functions or any other convenient representation), and in fitting the smile surface by minimization of a loss function (Coleman, Li, Verma (1999), Jackson, Sueli, Howison (1998)), suffer from the arbitrariness of the representation, particularly the arbitrariness of the behaviour of local volatility at the boundaries of the domain. Proponents of such approaches are always at pains trying to justify their favourite representation of the local volatility surface on grounds of its intuitive appeal or physical realism or what have you.…”
Section: The "Natural" Local Volatility Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dupire's derivation essentially shows that any smile surface can be fitted by local volatility provided the model is non parametric, and it basically provides the non parametric formula. On the other hand, methods consisting in parameterizing the local volatility surface a priori (through spline functions or any other convenient representation), and in fitting the smile surface by minimization of a loss function (Coleman, Li, Verma (1999), Jackson, Sueli, Howison (1998)), suffer from the arbitrariness of the representation, particularly the arbitrariness of the behaviour of local volatility at the boundaries of the domain. Proponents of such approaches are always at pains trying to justify their favourite representation of the local volatility surface on grounds of its intuitive appeal or physical realism or what have you.…”
Section: The "Natural" Local Volatility Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…More complicated models assume volatility surfaces across underlying asset prices and time (see, e.g. Andersen and Brotherton-Ratcliffe, 1998;Coleman et al, 1999, and references therein). These surfaces are often constructed by the implied volatilities under the Black and Scholes model for a variety of currently traded contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to simulations for real market data, we demonstrate the performance of the proposed method by using toy data set consisting of 22 European vanilla call options Coleman et al (1999). Let the initial stock price be 100, the riskless rate 5%, and the dividend rate 2%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%