2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-016-9682-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the Topology on Monoids and Polymorphism Clones of the Rationals

Abstract: We show how to reconstruct the topology on the monoid of endomorphisms of the rational numbers under the strict or reflexive order relation, and the polymorphism clone of the rational numbers under the reflexive relation. In addition we show how automatic homeomorphicity results can be lifted to polymorphism clones generated by monoids.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• all the examples from [5] and [2] (i.e., (N, =), the Rado graph, the countable universal homogeneous digraph, (Q, ≤),. .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• all the examples from [5] and [2] (i.e., (N, =), the Rado graph, the countable universal homogeneous digraph, (Q, ≤),. .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact it will usually be isomorphic to the superhomogeneous substructure. To see that we are not talking about an empty concept, let us have a look onto some examples: Another example are the maximally spread out substructures of (Q, ≤) introduced in [2] for showing that Emb(Q, ≤) has automatic homeomorphicity: Consider the 2-colored rationals (Q 2 , ≤). They are obtained from (Q, ≤) by assigning one of two colors (say, red and blue) to every rational in such a way that the red rationals and the blue rationals both form dense unbounded chains that lie dense in each other in the sense that between any two blue rationals there is a red one and between any two red rationals there is a blue one.…”
Section: Superhomogeneous Substructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this setting, as a by-product, we prove a new characterization of automatic homeomorphicity for transformation monoids on arbitrary carrier sets. It involves a weakening of the technical assumption that the only injective monoid endomorphism fixing every group member be the identical one, which has featured in several earlier reconstruction results [10,25,30,3]. We believe that our weakened version, so, by our characterization, automatic homeomorphicity, would also have been sufficient in any of these previous cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This is because the endomorphisms ψ ∈ E G are not necessarily closed maps, and therefore their images do not necessarily belong to the class K of closed transformation monoids over sets equipotent with the carrier of M . This is the same type of complication that has made additional arguments necessary in proving automatic homeomorphicity of End(Q, ≤), see [3,Lemma 4.1,p. 79] and the discussion next to it.…”
Section: And Assumementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(1) show that Aut(U) has automatic homeomorphicity with respect to K, (2) show that Aut(U) has automatic homeomorphicity with respect to K, (3) show that every isomorphism from End(U) to the the endomorphism monoid of a member of K is continuous, (4) show that every isomorphism from Pol(U) to the the polymorphism clone of a member of K is continuous, (5) show that every continuous isomorphism from Pol(U) to the polymorphism clone of a member of K is a homeomorphism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%