2006
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2006.10162880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the Status Quo: Linguistic Interaction in a Dual-Language School

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
54
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For an English-speaking child, the learning of a foreign language is an option, an enrichment, and any level of success is highly valued and applauded. Children are aware of this difference, and it affects their positioning in the classroom (Potowski 2004;Fitts 2006). Finally, White middle-class English-speaking children, who often occupy the English-speakers' seats in two-way programs, have been shown to dominate classroom discourse and thereby inadvertently rob Latino and other minority students of teacher time and attention (Valdés 1997;Olsen 1997;Delgado-Larocco 1998).…”
Section: Two-way Immersion: Innovative Solution or Deceptive Discrimimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For an English-speaking child, the learning of a foreign language is an option, an enrichment, and any level of success is highly valued and applauded. Children are aware of this difference, and it affects their positioning in the classroom (Potowski 2004;Fitts 2006). Finally, White middle-class English-speaking children, who often occupy the English-speakers' seats in two-way programs, have been shown to dominate classroom discourse and thereby inadvertently rob Latino and other minority students of teacher time and attention (Valdés 1997;Olsen 1997;Delgado-Larocco 1998).…”
Section: Two-way Immersion: Innovative Solution or Deceptive Discrimimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These programs also appear to be somewhat successful at offering language-majority students an opportunity to learn a foreign language without any damage to their English-language development or progress in school (Christian 1994;Christian et al 1997;Freeman 1998;Lindholm-Leary 2001;Potowski 2004). Although there is little research so far on the third goal, that of promoting equity and understanding in diverse settings, what has been done suggests that while this is an area in need of further scrutiny, some of these programs may also help to bridge cultural and linguistic gaps, at least within the school culture (Freeman 1998;Fitts 2006). Much depends, it seems, on the teachers as program implementers (Freeman 1998;TakahashiBreines 2002;Pérez 2004).…”
Section: Two-way Immersion: Innovative Solution or Deceptive Discrimimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The three primary goals of TWBI are for students to become bilingual and biliterate, achieve academically at or above grade level, and attain positive cross-cultural attitudes (Baker, 2011;Fortune & Tedick, 2008;Lindholm-Leary, 2001; Thomas & Collier, 2002;Valdés, 1997). In the U.S. the programs generally start in kindergarten and progress through middle or high school.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These studies have raised questions about the extent to which elementary TWI programs achieve linguistic equity (Amrein & Pena, 2000;Hadi-Tabassum, 2006;Wiese, 2004). They have also led to new understandings about how student identities are constructed through language practices in the classroom (Fitts, 2006;Potowski, 2004Potowski, , 2007Rubinstein-Avila, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%