2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2209.08883
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the neutron star equation of state from observational data via automatic differentiation

Abstract: The equation of state (EoS) that describes extremely dense matter under strong interactions is not completely understood. One reason is that the first-principle calculations of the EoS at finite chemical potential are challenging in nuclear physics. However, neutron star observables like masses, radii, moment of inertia and tidal deformability are direct probes to the EoS and hence make the EoS reconstruction task feasible. In this work, we present results from a novel deep learning technique that optimizes a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model-agnostic approaches to model the EOS have been employed extensively in recent years and roughly fall into two categories, namely, parameterized and non-parameterized methods. Non-parameterized approaches include, for example, Gaussian processes to infer the EOS (Landry & Essick 2019;Brandes et al 2023;Gorda et al 2022;Legred et al 2022), machine learning (Morawski & Bejger 2020;Fujimoto et al 2021;Han et al 2022b;Soma et al 2022), and nonparametric extensions of spectral expansion method (Han et al 2021(Han et al , 2022a. On the other hand, there exist various parameterized approaches that model the EOS by piecewise polytropes (Read et al 2009;Most et al 2018;Zhao & Lattimer 2018;O'Boyle et al 2020), or via a spectral-method representation of the EOS (Lindblom 2010(Lindblom , 2018, as well as some hybrids of these (Jiang et al 2020;Ferreira & Providência 2021;Huth et al 2022;Tang et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model-agnostic approaches to model the EOS have been employed extensively in recent years and roughly fall into two categories, namely, parameterized and non-parameterized methods. Non-parameterized approaches include, for example, Gaussian processes to infer the EOS (Landry & Essick 2019;Brandes et al 2023;Gorda et al 2022;Legred et al 2022), machine learning (Morawski & Bejger 2020;Fujimoto et al 2021;Han et al 2022b;Soma et al 2022), and nonparametric extensions of spectral expansion method (Han et al 2021(Han et al , 2022a. On the other hand, there exist various parameterized approaches that model the EOS by piecewise polytropes (Read et al 2009;Most et al 2018;Zhao & Lattimer 2018;O'Boyle et al 2020), or via a spectral-method representation of the EOS (Lindblom 2010(Lindblom , 2018, as well as some hybrids of these (Jiang et al 2020;Ferreira & Providência 2021;Huth et al 2022;Tang et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to significant stiffening of the CMF EoS owing to baryon-baryon repulsion [43]. Although not directly related to the formation of quark matter, such a pronounced stiffening at moderately high densities is characteristic of currently viable EoS with a phase transition or crossover to quark matter [56][57][58]. The stiffening is crucial for achieving maximum neutron star masses compatible with observational constraints and already tentatively supported by heavy-ion collisions [59,60].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…EoS from astrophysical observables [120,121] and inferring the parton distribution function of pions in lattice QCD studies [122]). The introduced DNN representation can preserve the smoothness of the spectral function automatically, helping to regularize the degeneracy issue in this inverse problem.…”
Section: Spectral Function Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%