Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1111/bre.12513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing the level of the central Red Sea evaporites at the end of the Miocene

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(363 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition coincides with changes in crustal seismic velocities (Tramontini and Davies 1969;Davies and Tramontini 1970;Egloff et al 1991). Symmetrical pairs of anomalies, which are indicative of oceanic crust (Hall, 1989), can be observed around the central Red Sea spreading axis to about this transition, thus dating it at 10 Ma (Mitchell et al 2021;Okwokwo et al 2022). However, those anomalies vary in spatial frequency, with high-frequency anomalies typical of normal seafloor spreading present to ~5 Ma but much smoother, low-frequency anomalies on crust older than 5 Ma.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The transition coincides with changes in crustal seismic velocities (Tramontini and Davies 1969;Davies and Tramontini 1970;Egloff et al 1991). Symmetrical pairs of anomalies, which are indicative of oceanic crust (Hall, 1989), can be observed around the central Red Sea spreading axis to about this transition, thus dating it at 10 Ma (Mitchell et al 2021;Okwokwo et al 2022). However, those anomalies vary in spatial frequency, with high-frequency anomalies typical of normal seafloor spreading present to ~5 Ma but much smoother, low-frequency anomalies on crust older than 5 Ma.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…From the stable ANS to the plate boundary, the Red Sea rift (Fig. 1a) is composed of 1) a coastal plain bounded by the external rift escarpments and underlain by tilted blocks and their accompanying syn-rift sediments 16 , 2) a smooth offshore shelf marked by a gradually increasing elevation toward the SSE 18 , and whose basement is blanketed by more than 1 km of Miocene evaporites 23,24,25 , and 3) a discontinuous 15-70-km-wide axial trough, essentially restricted to the Southern and Central Red Sea, where the oceanic crust and its rugged volcano-tectonic sea-floor are exposed except at the socalled "inter-trough zones" occupied by allochtonous salt flows 26,27,28,29 .…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Red Sea widens at spreading half-rates that range from ~8.5 mm/yr in the south to <5 mm/yr in the north (Chu and Gordon, 1998 ArRajehi et al, 2010). Seafloor spreading, basement subsidence, and overburden loading have caused creep and extensive distortion of the evaporites over the younger oceanic basaltic crust since the earliest halite deposition (Guennoc et al, 1988;Heaton et al, 1995;Mitchell et al, 2021). Thick salt glaciers creep towards the central rift axis, and the front defines an escarpment several hundred meters high (Feldens and Mitchell, 2015).…”
Section: Rift Basin Evolution and Evaporite Depositionmentioning
confidence: 99%