“…Geochemical approaches, relying on the reconstruction of metabolisms based on the rock record, have suggested that biological nitrogen fixation emerged early (Koehler et al., 2019; Ossa Ossa et al., 2019; Stüeken et al., 2016) and that the nitrogen cycle expanded considerably during the Neoarchean (2.8–2.5 Ga) and Paleoproterozoic (2.5–1.8 Ga) (Garvin et al., 2009a; Godfrey & Falkowski, 2009; Kipp et al., 2018; Koehler et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2018; Zerkle, Poulton, et al., 2017). Phylogenetics studies, relying on sequence data, reconstruct the evolutionary history of genes of interest (e.g., Boyd et al., 2011; Garcia et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2008), and some molecular clock studies have yielded conservative estimates for the approximate timing of an enzyme's origin (Boyd, et al., 2011; Boyd & Peters, 2013; Raymond et al., 2004). While each approach provides valuable insights, they both have weaknesses.…”