2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0022226710000381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing last week's weather: Syntactic reconstruction and Brythonic free relatives

Abstract: Lightfoot (2002) argues that syntactic reconstruction is rendered impossible by the lack of any analogue in syntax to the traditional notion of the phonological 'correspondence set ' of the Comparative Method and by the radical discontinuity caused by reanalysis between successive grammars. Alice Harris and Lyle Campbell, in various works, have defended the notion of ' syntactic pattern ' as the analogue of the correspondence set, arguing that patterns can be compared across languages, with innovations being s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other arguments against syntactic reconstruction have been brought forward in the literature, such as lack of arbitrariness in syntax, lack of cognates, lack of regularity, and the problem of discontinuous transmission. However, in addition to the early work of Harris and Campbell (1995) arguing for the reconstructability of syntax, more recent work has also supported the claim that syntactic reconstruction is not only possible but also quite feasible (Gildea, 1998;Campbell and Harris, 2003;Kikusawa, 2003;Harris, 2008;Bowern, 2008;Eythórsson and Barðdal, 2011;Willis, 2011;Eythórsson, 2012a, 2012b;Barðdal, 2013). We will begin with a discussion of arbitrariness and use the remainder of this article to continue with the argument that there need not be any lack of cognates in syntax.…”
Section: Reconstructing Proto-indo-european Argument Structuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several other arguments against syntactic reconstruction have been brought forward in the literature, such as lack of arbitrariness in syntax, lack of cognates, lack of regularity, and the problem of discontinuous transmission. However, in addition to the early work of Harris and Campbell (1995) arguing for the reconstructability of syntax, more recent work has also supported the claim that syntactic reconstruction is not only possible but also quite feasible (Gildea, 1998;Campbell and Harris, 2003;Kikusawa, 2003;Harris, 2008;Bowern, 2008;Eythórsson and Barðdal, 2011;Willis, 2011;Eythórsson, 2012a, 2012b;Barðdal, 2013). We will begin with a discussion of arbitrariness and use the remainder of this article to continue with the argument that there need not be any lack of cognates in syntax.…”
Section: Reconstructing Proto-indo-european Argument Structuresmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As with any syntactic analysis, the grammars themselves are modeled through observing the properties of surface strings combined with the theory of ug. Two examples of this kind of syntactic reconstruction in action are Willis (2011) and Walkden (2014). Walkden (2009Walkden ( : 35, 2014 attempts to address the correspondence problem by relying on the comparison of features of lexical items, particularly the exponents of (potentially null) functional heads.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that older varieties of British have occasional instances of vso beside some fronting examples (Schrijver 2011: 72-73) is, on this view, not problematic, since the use of vso would be in some way marked, but not precluded by the grammar. Willis (2011) suggests further that other important techniques that are common in phonological reconstruction can also be applied to syntax, including considerations of economy (the smallest number of innovations in the daughter languages should be posited), majority rules (only to be used when subgrouping is certain), archaisms, and the presence of anomalies. The last two are particularly important for internal reconstruction, which is the main focus of this paper.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This alleged lack of directionality has, in fact, been argued to be a pseudo-problem by many scholars, who have suggested analyses where this purported problem is satisfactorily dealt with (cf. Harris & Campbell 1995, Gildea 1998, Kikusawa 2003, Eythórsson & Barðdal 2011, Willis 2011, Barðdal & Eythórsson 2012a, 2017, Barðdal 2013, Barðdal & Smitherman 2013, Walkden 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%