2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing historical trends of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon deposition in a remote area of Spain using herbarium moss material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are are ubiquitous in the environment and concentrations increase with human population growth and fossil fuel use (Van Metre et al 2000; Foan et al 2010; Yang et al 2011). Aquatic environments are susceptible to PAH contamination in a variety of ways including oil shipping, oil refining, industrial outfall, wastewater discharges, urban runoff, and atmospheric deposition (Van Metre, Mahler et al 2000; Walker et al 2004; Van Metre and Mahler 2005; Hylland 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are are ubiquitous in the environment and concentrations increase with human population growth and fossil fuel use (Van Metre et al 2000; Foan et al 2010; Yang et al 2011). Aquatic environments are susceptible to PAH contamination in a variety of ways including oil shipping, oil refining, industrial outfall, wastewater discharges, urban runoff, and atmospheric deposition (Van Metre, Mahler et al 2000; Walker et al 2004; Van Metre and Mahler 2005; Hylland 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAHs are ubiquitous, and their levels in the environment track human population growth and burning of fossil fuels. 47 Estuarine habitats are vulnerable to PAH contamination via a variety of routes, including oil shipping and refining, industrial outfalls, wastewater discharges, urban runoff, and atmospheric deposition. 8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample treatment has traditionally involved Soxhlet [24,25] or Soxtec [26] apparatus which demand for long extraction times (3-24 h) and high volumes of organic solvents (100-200 mL of hexane, dichloromethane, acetonitrile, etc). So, recent research has focused on the simplification of moss sample treatment and techniques such as extraction assisted by ultrasounds [23,27] or microwaves [20,28] and accelerated solvent extraction [22,29] have been proposed as alternatives to the conventional ones, with extractions taking on average 30 min with 20-30 mL of M A N U S C R I P T A C C E P T E D ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 5 kg -1 using LC-FLD [22,31] and GC-MS [20,24,30], respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%