2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-022-05055-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing gene regulatory networks of biological function using differential equations of multilayer perceptrons

Abstract: Background Building biological networks with a certain function is a challenge in systems biology. For the functionality of small (less than ten nodes) biological networks, most methods are implemented by exhausting all possible network topological spaces. This exhaustive approach is difficult to scale to large-scale biological networks. And regulatory relationships are complex and often nonlinear or non-monotonic, which makes inference using linear models challenging. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trained neural network block thus encodes the ODEs governing the dynamics of gene expression, and hence encodes the underlying vector field and GRN. An important advantage of incorporating an ODE solver is that we can predict expression-changes for arbitrarily long time intervals without relying on predefined Euler discretizations, as is required by many other methods [4,12,18]. We further augmented this framework by allowing users to include prior knowledge of gene regulation in a flexible way, which acts as a domain-knowledge-informed regularizer or soft constraint of the NeuralODE [24] (Figure 1).…”
Section: The Phoenix Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trained neural network block thus encodes the ODEs governing the dynamics of gene expression, and hence encodes the underlying vector field and GRN. An important advantage of incorporating an ODE solver is that we can predict expression-changes for arbitrarily long time intervals without relying on predefined Euler discretizations, as is required by many other methods [4,12,18]. We further augmented this framework by allowing users to include prior knowledge of gene regulation in a flexible way, which acts as a domain-knowledge-informed regularizer or soft constraint of the NeuralODE [24] (Figure 1).…”
Section: The Phoenix Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of learning transitions between PHOENIX 3 consecutive time points, these "one-step" methods implicitly learn the local derivative (often referred to as "RNA velocity" [16]) dx dt | x=xt m , as an intermediary to estimating f . One significant issue with these approaches is scalability, and studying meaningfully large dynamical systems (ideally those describing the entire genome) has been too costly in terms of runtime and performance loss [4,6,17,18]. This leads to potential issues with generalizability as regulatory processes operate genome-wide and even small perturbations can have wide-ranging regulatory effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trained neural network block thus encodes the ODEs governing the dynamics of gene expression and hence encodes the underlying vector field and GRN. An important advantage of incorporating an ODE solver is that we can predict expression changes for arbitrarily long time intervals without relying on predefined Euler discretizations, as is required by many other methods [4, 12, 18]. We further augmented this framework by allowing users to include prior knowledge of gene regulation in a flexible way, which acts as a domain-knowledge-informed regularizer or soft constraint of the NeuralODE [24] ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: The Phoenix Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of learning transitions between consecutive time points, these “one-step” methods implicitly learn the local derivative (in the context of single cell sequencing often referred to as “RNA velocity” [16]) , as an intermediary to estimating f . One significant issue with these approaches is scalability, and studying meaningfully large dynamical systems (ideally those describing the entire genome) has so far been hindered by a large performance loss and missing interpretability [4, 6, 17, 18]. This leads to potential issues with generalizability as regulatory processes operate genome-wide and even small perturbations can have wide-ranging regulatory effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, owing to the increasing demand for high-performance computing (HPC) as well as the scale-up supercomputers and intelligent computing systems, the reliability of large-scale computing systems has been investigated extensively [ 1 4 ]. The system operation is complex, and failures occur frequently which are difficult to detect, locate, diagnose, analyze, and debug [ 1 , 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%