2009
DOI: 10.1002/jqs.1297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing ENSO: the influence of method, proxy data, climate forcing and teleconnections

Abstract: In this study we compare three newly developed independent NINO3.4 sea surface temperature (SST) reconstructions using data from (1) the central Pacific (corals), (2) the TexMex region of the USA (tree rings) and (3) other regions in the Tropics (corals and an ice core) which are teleconnected with central Pacific SSTs in the 20th century. Although these three reconstructions are strongly calibrated and well verified, inter-proxy comparison shows a significant weakening in interproxy coherence in the 19th cent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
193
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
10
193
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2 demonstrates how miscounting errors may produce an apparent amplitude modulation of otherwise stationary signals, producing spurious trends in the average derived from them. Because climate reconstruction methods rely in some fashion on a weighted average of observations assumed to be contemporaneous, this may partially explain why many ENSO reconstructions (e.g., Mann et al, 2000;Wilson et al, 2010;McGregor et al, 2010;Li et al, 2011; display increasing trends in ENSO variance over time (McGregor et al, 2013). As pointed out in the latter study, computing ENSO variance on individual records prior to averaging them together is more robust to chronological errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…2 demonstrates how miscounting errors may produce an apparent amplitude modulation of otherwise stationary signals, producing spurious trends in the average derived from them. Because climate reconstruction methods rely in some fashion on a weighted average of observations assumed to be contemporaneous, this may partially explain why many ENSO reconstructions (e.g., Mann et al, 2000;Wilson et al, 2010;McGregor et al, 2010;Li et al, 2011; display increasing trends in ENSO variance over time (McGregor et al, 2013). As pointed out in the latter study, computing ENSO variance on individual records prior to averaging them together is more robust to chronological errors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Similar to the need for increased logbook digitisation, there is also large scope for an increased coverage of proxy networks. An increase in the number of corals from the Pacific Ocean would help to improve the reconstruction of the different flavours of ENSO (Wilson et al 2010). Recent work has looked at using proxies from regions where the EP and CP signals are distinctly different, in order to distinguish between ENSO flavours (Schollaen et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1. Wilson et al (2010) provide a normalised NINO3.4 reconstructions which uses proxy data from teleconnection (TEL) regions. Annually resolved proxies were used from teleconnection regions within the tropics.…”
Section: Multi-proxy Enso Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiproxy networks comprise data from multiple archives and multiple sites. Such networks are used to reconstruct climatic variables from the regional to global scale, generating spatial averages (e.g., Mann et al 2008), gridded spatial fields (e.g., Mann et al 2009), or indices of largescale modes of variability such as El Niño-Southern Oscillation (e.g., Wilson et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%