2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69395-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing Cortical Networks: Case of Directed Graphs with High Level of Reciprocity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, the earliest link prediction effort in the context of brain neuronal networks goes back to a 1998 paper by Jouve et al (Jouve et al, 1998), which uses the frequency of directed transitive triples to predict missing links at the binary level (existing or not), in an early dataset on the macaque visual system (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). The next brain link prediction papers appear almost a decade later, which incorporate additional topological and spatial features (Costa et al, 2007;Nepusz et al, 2008), both based on the CoCoMac database (Kötter, 2004), with the latter using a stochastic graph fitting method to handle the uncertainties in the data. Several other publications followed these papers (Hoff, 2009;Cannistraci et al, 2013;Hinne et al, 2017;Røge et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2020;Shen et al, 2019), but all (including the earliest three) are based on preconceived network models whose parameters are fitted to the data, and then used to make predictions (usually at a binary level) on missing links.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, the earliest link prediction effort in the context of brain neuronal networks goes back to a 1998 paper by Jouve et al (Jouve et al, 1998), which uses the frequency of directed transitive triples to predict missing links at the binary level (existing or not), in an early dataset on the macaque visual system (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). The next brain link prediction papers appear almost a decade later, which incorporate additional topological and spatial features (Costa et al, 2007;Nepusz et al, 2008), both based on the CoCoMac database (Kötter, 2004), with the latter using a stochastic graph fitting method to handle the uncertainties in the data. Several other publications followed these papers (Hoff, 2009;Cannistraci et al, 2013;Hinne et al, 2017;Røge et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2020;Shen et al, 2019), but all (including the earliest three) are based on preconceived network models whose parameters are fitted to the data, and then used to make predictions (usually at a binary level) on missing links.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that link probability matrices similar to the previous examples can be also used for community detection as pointed out by Nepusz et al in [28,29]. In their approach (inspired by Szemerédi's regularity lemma [30]) the diagonal elements of the matrix give the the link density inside the corresponding communities, whereas the off-diagonal elements correspond to the link probabilities between the groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The proposed system for the automatic inference of graph models works only with undirected networks, and while cortical networks are thought to be directed networks, it has been shown that an undirected approximation is a reasonable relaxation because the majority of connections are reciprocal [22,36]. The cat cortical network dataset [28] in its undirected form contains 52 cortical nodes and 515 edges.…”
Section: Cortical Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%