2014
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructing atmospheric CO2 during the Plio–Pleistocene transition by fossil Typha

Abstract: The Earth has undergone a significant climate switch from greenhouse to icehouse during the Plio-Pleistocene transition (PPT) around 2.7-2.4 million years ago (Ma), marked by the intensification of the Northern Hemisphere glaciation (NHG) ~2.7 Ma. Evidence based on oceanic CO2 [(CO2)aq], supposed to be in close equilibrium with the atmospheric CO2 [(CO2)atm], suggests that the CO2 decline might drive such climate cooling. However, the rarity of direct evidence from [CO2]atm during the interval prevents determi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(77 reference statements)
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threshold CO 2 concentration for effects on SD and SI is based on all plant life forms considered in this study; accurate assessment of the individual threshold of each plant life form will require additional data. In contrast, the RR of the SI showed a negative response to increasing CO 2 up to approximately 700 ppm; thus, SI may be a better and more reliable CO 2 proxy than SD because it responds in a sensitive way to CO 2 changes, as reported in previous studies (Haworth et al ., ; Rivera et al ., ; Bai et al ., ; Hu et al ., ). In addition, SD is sensitive to factors that affect the initiation of stomata and cell expansion, and cell expansion is affected by many variables (e.g., light, temperature, and water status); thus, changes in these variables can mask the effects of signals that cause stomatal initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The threshold CO 2 concentration for effects on SD and SI is based on all plant life forms considered in this study; accurate assessment of the individual threshold of each plant life form will require additional data. In contrast, the RR of the SI showed a negative response to increasing CO 2 up to approximately 700 ppm; thus, SI may be a better and more reliable CO 2 proxy than SD because it responds in a sensitive way to CO 2 changes, as reported in previous studies (Haworth et al ., ; Rivera et al ., ; Bai et al ., ; Hu et al ., ). In addition, SD is sensitive to factors that affect the initiation of stomata and cell expansion, and cell expansion is affected by many variables (e.g., light, temperature, and water status); thus, changes in these variables can mask the effects of signals that cause stomatal initiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated CO 2 can stimulate cell division and expansion, resulting in thicker leaves with more numerous cells or cell layers and/or larger cells (Ferris et al, 2001;Luomala et al, 2005). In addition, different responses of stomatal density (SD, the number of stomatal pores per unit leaf area) to changes in the CO 2 concentration have also been reported (Haworth et al, 2011a;Bai et al, 2015). Experimental results have shown decreases, no effect or even increases in SD as the CO 2 concentration increases (Ferris & Taylor, 1994;Amthor, 1995;Dixon et al, 1995;Reddy et al, 1998;Ferris et al, 2002;Marchi et al, 2004;Luomala et al, 2005;Xu & Zhou, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu et al: Late middle Eocene pCO 2 based on the Nageia leaves cus (Kürschner et al, 1996(Kürschner et al, , 2001, Laurus and Ocotea (Kürschner et al, 2008). Recently, positive correlations between stomatal index or stomatal frequency and pCO 2 have been reported based on fossil Typha and Quercus (Bai et al, 2015;Hu et al, 2015). However, the tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forest conifer tree Nageia has not been used previously in paleobotanical estimates of pCO 2 concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past three decades, since publication of Woodward's (Woodward, 1987) seminal article on the inverse relationship between stomatal density and atmospheric CO 2 concentration, the "uncontrolled variability" in stomatal traits such as stomatal density (SD) and stomatal index (SI) has been seized on by paleobiologists as an opportunity to extract meaningful paleoclimatic and paleoecological information from fossil plant stomata (McElwain et al, 2005;Roth-Nebelsick, 2005;Wagner et al, 2005;Kürschner et al, 2008;Lammertsma et al, 2011;Steinthorsdottir et al, 2011b;Franks et al, 2014;Maxbauer et al, 2014;Bai et al, 2015;Montañez et al, 2016;Steinthorsdottir et al, 2016aSteinthorsdottir et al, , 2016b. This has led to a subtle tension in the field of paleobotany, where at one extreme some studies have focused almost exclusively on the taxonomic and systematic utility of stomata with insufficient consideration of environmentally driven variability, while at the other extreme some reconstructions of paleoatmospheric composition have been undertaken using fossil stomatal traits without due consideration for taxonomic determination of the fossils used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%