2004
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m408090200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstitution and Analysis of Soluble Inhibin and Activin Receptor Complexes in a Cell-free System

Abstract: Activins and inhibins compose a heterogeneous subfamily within the transforming growth factor-␤ (TGF-␤) superfamily of growth and differentiation factors with critical biological activities in embryos and adults. They signal through a heteromeric complex of type II, type I, and for inhibin, type III receptors. To characterize the affinity, specificity, and activity of these receptors (alone and in combination) for the inhibin/activin subfamily, we developed a cell-free assay system using soluble receptor-Fc fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have determined affinities of ActRIIB for different ligands (30,33,34); however, these studies did not result in any consensus because data varied greatly, depending on the assay design, experimental conditions, source of ligands and receptors, etc. To determine the binding parameters of different ligands and ActRIIB, we used SPR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have determined affinities of ActRIIB for different ligands (30,33,34); however, these studies did not result in any consensus because data varied greatly, depending on the assay design, experimental conditions, source of ligands and receptors, etc. To determine the binding parameters of different ligands and ActRIIB, we used SPR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, FSH was unchanged in the placebo group on day 8 (1.1% increase; p > 0.05). In addition, subjects receiving ACE-011 showed significant reductions from baseline in comparison with those receiving placebo at most time points (p 0.01 at days 3, 8, 15, 29, and 57 in the 1.0-mg/kg IV group; p 0.01 at days 3,8,15,29,57, and 85 in the 3.0-mg/kg IV group). In these two dose groups, the greatest change in placebo-corrected mean percent change from baseline in FSH was 39.1% and 50.1% for the 1.0-and 3.0-mg/kg IV groups at day 15, respectively.…”
Section: Serum Fshmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Serum concentrations of FSH were assessed as a readout for biological activity of ACE-011. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSALP), procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), procollagen type I C terminal propeptide (PICP), and total osteocalcin were assessed regularly to look at changes in markers of bone formation, and serum C-terminal type 1 collagen telopeptide (CTX) and TRACP-5b were assessed at baseline and study days 3,8,15,29,57,85, and 120 to look at changes in markers of bone resorption. Bone biomarkers were measured by immunoassay (Synarc, Lyon, France).…”
Section: Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies revealed that mutated FOP-ACVR1 abnormally transduces BMP signaling in response to Activin-A, a molecule that normally transduces TGF-β signaling but not BMP signaling. This neofunction of Activin-A raised the possibility that the inhibition of Activin-A signaling by Activin-A-specific-neutralizing antibody or by broad-acting BMP and Activin blockers like ACVR2A-Fc and ACVR2B-Fc (38)(39)(40)(41)(42) could be a new treatment strategy for FOP. Although Activin-A evoked enhanced chondrogenesis of induced mesenchymal stromal cells derived from FOP-iPSCs (FOP-iMSCs) via BMP and TGF-β signaling (38,43), the detailed mechanism, especially downstream effectors of Activin-A/FOP-ACVR1, is largely unexplained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%