2001
DOI: 10.2307/1352874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsidering the Physics of the Chesapeake Bay Estuarine Turbidity Maximum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
98
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of the TMZ is generally attributed to gravitational circulation, tidal trapping, and sediment resuspension (Wai et al, 2004). TMZ has been observed and studied in many estuaries, including Gironde Estuary in France (Allen et al, 1977), Chesapeake Bay in USA (Sanford et al, 2001), St. Lawrence Estuary in Canada (Hamblin, 1989), Fly River Estuary in Papua New Guinea (Wolanski et al, 1995), Tamar Estuary in England (Uncles and Stephens, 1993), and Changjiang Estuary in China (Shen et al, 2008). However, the formation mechanism of TMZ varies between different estuaries, the location and intensity of TMZ are sensitive to changes in tidal range and freshwater flow within one estuary (Mitchell, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of the TMZ is generally attributed to gravitational circulation, tidal trapping, and sediment resuspension (Wai et al, 2004). TMZ has been observed and studied in many estuaries, including Gironde Estuary in France (Allen et al, 1977), Chesapeake Bay in USA (Sanford et al, 2001), St. Lawrence Estuary in Canada (Hamblin, 1989), Fly River Estuary in Papua New Guinea (Wolanski et al, 1995), Tamar Estuary in England (Uncles and Stephens, 1993), and Changjiang Estuary in China (Shen et al, 2008). However, the formation mechanism of TMZ varies between different estuaries, the location and intensity of TMZ are sensitive to changes in tidal range and freshwater flow within one estuary (Mitchell, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that re-suspended particles settle to the sediment bed during slack period before starting of ebb tide. They get re-suspended from the sediment with ebb currents, remain suspended to a certain degree and then settle to the bottom 47 . The pathogenic bacteria attached to suspended particles increase their downward flux to the bottom sediment 11,48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flood tide currents cause re-suspension of sediment bed and transfer particles towards land. During ebb currents particles move towards the sea and settle to the bottom sediment 47,50 . An earlier study in this estuary had also pointed out that the effluents containing high numbers of pathogenic bacteria accumulate towards downstream during low tide-period 6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…closer to the river mouth) than recorded during our sampling in June, when discharge in the Gulf of Finland catchment is at its annual 30 maximum (Voipio, 1981). Assuming the suspended particulate maximum and associated gravitational settling to follow the lateral migration of the halocline through time (Geyer, 1993;Sanford et al, 2001), the focal point of sedimentation for flocculated material may thus be closer to the river mouth than implied by the June 2015 data. Notably, maximum sedimentary Fe concentrations were observed at station B (Fig.…”
Section: The Impact Of Flocculation On Sedimentary Om and Fe In The Umentioning
confidence: 96%