Reconsidering Rationales for Local Self-Government - Impacts of Contemporary Changes in Local Decision-Making

Abstract

This paper discusses two contemporary trends in local decision-making. Firstly, there seems to be more centralised decisionmaking today than before in important policy fields such as welfare policy. Secondly, informal governance processes outside formal government structures open up for a substantial influence from nonelected political actors. The paper asserts that there is a connection between the trends, and argues that the centralisation tendencies in welfare issues might affect and encourage governance processes in other local policy arenas. These policy fields are mainly within the socalled 'developmental policies' that often facilitate more networking and partnership activities in 'grey areas' between the public, private and civil sectors in collective problem solving. Accordingly, more attention should be given to policy fields where governance networks operate, and the implications for revitalising democratic political participation should be studied. The paper concludes that the well-established rationales for local self-government and local democracy need to be reconsidered by taking into account these new decision-making structures.

Fiscal policy disclosure in indonesian local governments

“…In the governance structure for public sector, local parliament is an institution that has an important check and balance function to ensure that the local government executives execute their job well in the interests of all stakeholders (Lyngstad 2010). Grigorescu (2008) interprets this function as horizontal accountability.…”

Financial reporting compliance in Indonesian local governments: Mimetic pressure dominates

“…Under normative isomorphism, a hypothesis is developed to test the impact of a possibly explanatory variable namely political influence. In the governance structure of public sector, local parliament is an institution that has an important check and balance function to ensure that the local government executives execute their job well in the interests of all stakeholders (Lyngstad 2010). Grigorescu (2008) interprets this function as horizontal accountability.…”