2018
DOI: 10.1353/bsr.2018.0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsidering Femme Identity: On Centering Trans* Counterculture and Conceptualizing Trans*Femme Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often, this branching spans across identities, including transgender men, cisgender men, transgender women, cisgender women, and non-binary individuals of all sexual orientations (Blair & Hoskin, 2015;2016;Coyote & Sharman, 2011). Consequently, contemporary femme centralizes and brings together the plurality of queer femininities (Hoskin, 2017a;Shelton, 2018). This ostensible distinction brings with it a reoccurring question within femme scholarship: How can scholars explore emergent contemporary invocations and meanings of femme without conceptually severing the femmes of the "past"?…”
Section: Honoring and Expanding Femmementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Often, this branching spans across identities, including transgender men, cisgender men, transgender women, cisgender women, and non-binary individuals of all sexual orientations (Blair & Hoskin, 2015;2016;Coyote & Sharman, 2011). Consequently, contemporary femme centralizes and brings together the plurality of queer femininities (Hoskin, 2017a;Shelton, 2018). This ostensible distinction brings with it a reoccurring question within femme scholarship: How can scholars explore emergent contemporary invocations and meanings of femme without conceptually severing the femmes of the "past"?…”
Section: Honoring and Expanding Femmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…What can be made of femme proliferation or plurality, and can femme be applied as a theoretical framework (Hoskin, 2017a;, a figuration (Dahl, 2012), a frame of reference (Shelton, 2018), a category crisis (Samuels, 2003), or an assemblage to rethink femininity (McCann, 2018)? Is the only way to honor fore-femmes by keeping this identity rooted in the very systems by which they, and their butches, were oppressed?…”
Section: Honoring and Expanding Femmementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Community connectedness is defined as “the strength of an individual’s affiliation with a group to create a mutually influential relationship and sense of belonging” [ 29 32 ]. Pflum’s [ 18 ] study of transfemme individuals (those who were not assigned female at birth and present as women or feminine, see [ 33 ] for more on this identity) identified that increasing community connectedness and seeking social support are linked to a decrease in adverse mental health effects. In building a connection with a community, trans individuals may seek support for a variety of reasons, and not always from trans-specific communities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%