2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsideration on the elastic damage/degradation theory for the modeling of microcrack closure-reopening (MCR) effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cases D 0 and D 1 correspond to the classical plasticity model (Chen, 1994) and the elastic damage (degradation) model (Carol et al, 1994;Wu and Xu, 2013), respectively. For the intermediate parameter 2 .0; 1/, both the material compliance C (or the damage one C d ) and the plastic strain p are internal variables, resulting in a combined plastic-damage model.…”
Section: Evolution Laws and Rate Constitutive Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases D 0 and D 1 correspond to the classical plasticity model (Chen, 1994) and the elastic damage (degradation) model (Carol et al, 1994;Wu and Xu, 2013), respectively. For the intermediate parameter 2 .0; 1/, both the material compliance C (or the damage one C d ) and the plastic strain p are internal variables, resulting in a combined plastic-damage model.…”
Section: Evolution Laws and Rate Constitutive Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stiffness recovery due to crack closure (sometimes referred to as the ‘unilateral effect’) has been considered in a number of continuum damage and plastic‐damage constitutive models . A particular procedure involving the recovery of stiffness in models that decompose the stress and strain tensors into positive and negative parts was shown (under certain circumstances) to lead to thermodynamically inconsistent results , but these issues appear to have been resolved in a recent formulation by Wu and Xu .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…      I P P P (74) Remark 6.1: Wu and Xu (2013) demonstrate that the derivative expressed by Eq. (71) also serves as the thermodynamically consistent projection operator such that : .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%