2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconsideration of the factorial structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11): Assessment of impulsivity in a large population of euthymic bipolar patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Impulsivity represents an important building block in our understanding of behaviour beyond defined psychiatric diagnoses. Despite the information already acquired, there is often still no consensus regarding its exact dimensional classification [ 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Further studies with larger cohorts are therefore of great importance for a detailed understanding of this behavioural phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impulsivity represents an important building block in our understanding of behaviour beyond defined psychiatric diagnoses. Despite the information already acquired, there is often still no consensus regarding its exact dimensional classification [ 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ]. Further studies with larger cohorts are therefore of great importance for a detailed understanding of this behavioural phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the manner in which impulsivity was assessed may further account for different relations between diagnoses. The BIS-11 is the most widely used instrument for the assessment of impulsivity in clinical populations but a very recent examination of its reliability in euthymic BD suggests the original item structure may not be optimal (64). Although BIS-11 scores in BD and BPD were similar in the current study (BPD marginally higher, but not significantly different) the instrument may show greater item proximity to the experiences of individuals with BPD compared to BD which may also contribute to the closer associations detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, several studies have reported a substantial reduction in the number of items after analyzing its factor structure. For example, the analyses conducted by Morean et al (2014) and Steinberg et al (2013) reduced the scale to just 8 items, whereas the studies by Coutlee et al (2014) and Kahn et al (2019) reduced the scale to a total of 13 and 12 items, respectively. In this sense, Steinberg et al (2013) suggest that the more items included, the more likely it is that one of them departs from the central construct being measured.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%