2002
DOI: 10.1086/324777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconnection Rate in the Decay Phase of a Long Duration Event Flare on 1997 May 12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
94
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
9
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method for calculating the reconnection rate outlined by Isobe et al (2002), derives the temperature T and the emission measure using the filter ratio method on SXT data. As this was not possible with this current data set, it is assumed that we have a temperature of 1.0 MK (peak formation temperature of 171 Å) and a density n of 3.0 × 10 9 cm −3 (Isobe et al 2002; Ramesh et al 2005).…”
Section: Estimation Of Reconnection Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The method for calculating the reconnection rate outlined by Isobe et al (2002), derives the temperature T and the emission measure using the filter ratio method on SXT data. As this was not possible with this current data set, it is assumed that we have a temperature of 1.0 MK (peak formation temperature of 171 Å) and a density n of 3.0 × 10 9 cm −3 (Isobe et al 2002; Ramesh et al 2005).…”
Section: Estimation Of Reconnection Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this was not possible with this current data set, it is assumed that we have a temperature of 1.0 MK (peak formation temperature of 171 Å) and a density n of 3.0 × 10 9 cm −3 (Isobe et al 2002; Ramesh et al 2005). The effect of varying these values is discussed later.…”
Section: Estimation Of Reconnection Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations