2009
DOI: 10.1007/s12036-009-0007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconnection in solar flares: Outstanding questions

Abstract: Space observations of solar flares such as those from Yohkoh, SOHO, TRACE, and RHESSI have revealed a lot of observational evidence of magnetic reconnection in solar flares: cusp-shaped arcades, reconnection inflows, plasmoids, etc. Thus it has been established, at least phenomenologically, that magnetic reconnection does occur in solar flares. However, a number of fundamental questions and puzzles still remain in the physics of reconnection in solar flares. In this paper, we discuss the recent progresses and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(The terms "large" and "small" amplitude are defined later in this Section.) The exciters identified thus far include Moreton or EIT waves (Eto et al 2002;Okamoto et al 2004;Gilbert et al 2008;Asai et al 2012), EUV waves (Liu et al 2012;Shen et al 2014a;Xue et al 2014;Takahashi et al 2015), shock waves (Shen et al 2014b), nearby jets, subflares and flares (Jing et al 2003(Jing et al , 2006Vršnak et al 2007;, and the eruption of the filament (Isobe & Tripathi 2006;Isobe et al 2007;Pouget 2007;Chen et al 2008;Foullon et al 2009;Bocchialini et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(The terms "large" and "small" amplitude are defined later in this Section.) The exciters identified thus far include Moreton or EIT waves (Eto et al 2002;Okamoto et al 2004;Gilbert et al 2008;Asai et al 2012), EUV waves (Liu et al 2012;Shen et al 2014a;Xue et al 2014;Takahashi et al 2015), shock waves (Shen et al 2014b), nearby jets, subflares and flares (Jing et al 2003(Jing et al , 2006Vršnak et al 2007;, and the eruption of the filament (Isobe & Tripathi 2006;Isobe et al 2007;Pouget 2007;Chen et al 2008;Foullon et al 2009;Bocchialini et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4(a) that the heat conduction in the physical environment similar to the solar corona will make the reconnection rate higher up to a value that exceeds 0.003 during the plasmoid instability process. On the other hand, according to the observational evidence (Nagashima & Yokoyama 2006;Isobe & Shibata 2009), the estimated reconnection rate is in the range 0.001 − 0.07. Therefore, the global reconnection rate measured from our simulations should be fast enough to explain the solar flares observed in the solar corona.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sweet-Parker reconnection is extremely slow, even when kinetic effects are accounted for (Comisso & Asenjo, 2014), and it is well known that the solar flares in the sun require reconnection rates orders of magnitude faster than the Sweet-Parker value (e.g. Isobe & Shibata, 2009;Kagan et al, 2015;Galtier, 2016). Therefore, one of the fundamental questions relating to magnetic reconnection is how fast reconnection can take place, which is generally thought to happen via tearing/plasmoid instabilities that cause the current sheet to fragment into a series of magnetic islands (e.g.…”
Section: Magnetic Reconnectionmentioning
confidence: 99%