2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-015-0264-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconnection flow jets in 3D as a source of structured dipolarization fronts

Abstract: Three-dimensional electromagnetic particle-in-cell simulations are used to investigate the propagation and breakup of a reconnection flow jet of initial cross-tail extent 24d i (∼ 1.5R E ; d i is the ion inertial length). Such a front is found to separate into two segments, with the dawnward portion propagating ahead of the duskward one. Both segments expand duskward, reaching separate lengths of 18-25d i , and both segments develop internal structures on east-west scales of 1-2d i . The currents responsible f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This head propagates toward the Earth then breaks up into smaller structures due to the ballooning/interchange instability acting in the narrow region of increasing B z (at the leading edge of the head) and finally produces localized B z enhancements/depletions (see Pritchett & Coroniti, ). A similar breakup of fronts produced by magnetic reconnection localized in the cross‐tail direction has been observed in (Pritchett, , , ). System spatial scales in the simulation box are normalized to the ion gyroradius, ρ i 0 , calculated using the initial magnitude of the current sheet magnetic field, B 0 , and the initial ion temperature T i .…”
Section: Identification Of Mhs In Dipolarization Front Simulationssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This head propagates toward the Earth then breaks up into smaller structures due to the ballooning/interchange instability acting in the narrow region of increasing B z (at the leading edge of the head) and finally produces localized B z enhancements/depletions (see Pritchett & Coroniti, ). A similar breakup of fronts produced by magnetic reconnection localized in the cross‐tail direction has been observed in (Pritchett, , , ). System spatial scales in the simulation box are normalized to the ion gyroradius, ρ i 0 , calculated using the initial magnitude of the current sheet magnetic field, B 0 , and the initial ion temperature T i .…”
Section: Identification Of Mhs In Dipolarization Front Simulationssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These observational results support the sub‐ion hole formation due to the dipolarization front ballooning/interchange instability. Such an instability can generate localized depressions of B z field (Pritchett, , and references therein). Comparison of observations and PIC simulation of the front dynamics confirms the formation of such holes behind the front.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To initiate reconnection in the present near‐Earth configuration, we follow the procedure employed by Pritchett [, , ] in which the cross‐tail current is “blocked” in a region of finite width in y . This procedure is very effective at initiating localized reconnection, and it essentially represents the imposition of a very large anomalous resistivity that scatters the particles in this region.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The front acted as a thermalization site for the ion bulk flow and contributed significantly to the dissipation of magnetic energy. Pritchett [, , ] used a procedure in which the cross‐tail current was interrupted in a localized region to produce a self‐consistent generation of a localized reconnection configuration. Jet fronts with initial cross‐tail width <12 d i underwent a marked expansion in the ion drift direction, reaching a total width of 15–20 d i regardless of the initial width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topics and related papers are: control of magnetospheric conditions by solar wind parameters (Kubyshkina et al 2015;Sergeev et al 2015;Troshichev and Sormakov 2015), modeling of reconnection and instabilities in the tail (Birn et al 2015;Pritchett 2015;Uchino and Machida 2015), relationships between relativistic electrons and pulsations in the inner magnetosphere Hajra et al 2015;Teramoto et al 2016), the effects of substorms on ionospheric irregularities and currents (Berngardt et al 2015;Cherniak and Zakharenkova 2015;Connors and Rostoker 2015), auroral disturbances during substorms Tanaka et al 2015), and ground magnetometer chains (Connors et al 2016). In addition, a review paper by Akasofu (2015) based on his presentation at ICS-12 was published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%