2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1803.06074
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfiguring spanning and induced subgraphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we are the first to consider the reconfiguration of minors, several papers have considered the reconfiguration of subgraphs [5,10]. The representation of a configuration as a labeling of the vertices has been used for problems entailing moving labels from a source to a target configuration using the minimum number of swaps, where labels (or tokens) on adjacent vertices can be exchanged (detailed in a survey of reconfiguration [11]), and labeled edges have been considered in the reconfiguring of triangulations [8].…”
Section: :2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we are the first to consider the reconfiguration of minors, several papers have considered the reconfiguration of subgraphs [5,10]. The representation of a configuration as a labeling of the vertices has been used for problems entailing moving labels from a source to a target configuration using the minimum number of swaps, where labels (or tokens) on adjacent vertices can be exchanged (detailed in a survey of reconfiguration [11]), and labeled edges have been considered in the reconfiguring of triangulations [8].…”
Section: :2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the paper, we required every vertex of G to be a member of a branch set in an H-model. If instead we considered a subgraph of G, a solution might entail the labeling of a subset of the vertices of G. We observe that when the number of labels is equal to the number of vertices in H, the problem is reduced subgraph isomorphism [5]. Alternative mappings can be considered as well, such as topological embedding of one graph in another.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%