Reconfiguring Sovereignty in Foucauldian Genealogies of Power: The Case of English Master and Servant Law and the Dispersion and the Exercise of Sovereignty in the Modern Age

Abstract

This paper is a critique and partial reconfiguration of the Foucauldian genealogy of sovereignty. Sovereignty is largely conceptualized as the antithesis of governmentality and disciplinary power in the modern age; presented as a negative case as a juridical and centralized power of interdiction and containment in the classical age. I argue that we can genealogically examine how sovereignty in the modern age underwent transformation and dispersion. My empirical focus is on how master and servant law in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, along with the development and transformations of local courts, led to the increasingly dispersal of sovereign power as it as practiced in specific industrial sites and regions.

States of Exception: Legal Governance of Trans Women in Urban Turkey

“… 2. Studies on crime control strategies (Carlson, 2014; Flacks, 2018; Stenson, 1999), contemporary carceral regimes (Haritaworn et al, 2014; Lamble, 2013), immigration and refugee management (Maillet et al, 2018; Rajaram and Grundy-Warr, 2004) and control of labour (Steinberg, 2016; Whyte, 2009) can be included in this list. …”