2018
DOI: 10.1101/500967
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurations within resonating communities of brain regions following TMS reveal different scales of processing

Abstract: 16An overarching goal of neuroscience research is to understand how heterogeneous neuronal 17 ensembles cohere into networks of coordinated activity to support cognition. To investigate how local 18 activity harmonizes with global signals, we measured electroencephalography (EEG) while single

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 and follows procedures recommended in a review of community distillation of neural networks 86 . This procedure is also consistent with a previous investigation of single-pulse TMS network dynamics within band-specific intrinsic oscillatory activity 87 .…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…7 and follows procedures recommended in a review of community distillation of neural networks 86 . This procedure is also consistent with a previous investigation of single-pulse TMS network dynamics within band-specific intrinsic oscillatory activity 87 .…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Here, we use dynamic community detection (for review, Garcia et al, 2018) to distill connectivity patterns derived from phase-based statistical dependencies into communities, or clusters of electrodes and then estimated shifts in communities across time. We have previously extended this method to EEG on a limited number of channels (Garcia et al, 2020), but there are lingering questions on robustness of the method to varying number of channels, the cognitive aspects the chosen temporal window might capture, and the parameter search. Future studies may explore other techniques to capture the processes underlying opinion formation, change, and generally complex decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We swept the parameter space from .5-4 for each parameter, subject, and segment and compared the mean estimated modularity value Q to a shuffled null dataset. We chose a parameter set that on average produced more than 1 community and was the highest difference in modularity from the estimated modularity from the shuffled null dataset (see Garcia et al, 2020; Garcia et al, 2020 for a similar procedure). This resulted in ɣ = 1.1364 and ⍵ = 0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations