2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2019.162691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurable positron annihilation lifetime spectrometer utilizing a multi-channel digitizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the FWHM of the peak is almost inversely proportional to the square root of the deposited energy [18], it can be inferred that the energy resolution of our system at 662 keV is 3.59%, almost the same of the references. For more comparison, we tested the energy resolution by a set of conventional systems using the same detectors and ORTEC-572 amplifier [19]. The 511 keV photopeak energy resolution of the control group was 4.59%, worse than the result of our system.…”
Section: Pal Spectra Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As the FWHM of the peak is almost inversely proportional to the square root of the deposited energy [18], it can be inferred that the energy resolution of our system at 662 keV is 3.59%, almost the same of the references. For more comparison, we tested the energy resolution by a set of conventional systems using the same detectors and ORTEC-572 amplifier [19]. The 511 keV photopeak energy resolution of the control group was 4.59%, worse than the result of our system.…”
Section: Pal Spectra Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The range between 511 and 1275 keV photopeaks is included. Then we use software to set the energy windows for start and stop signals [13]. As we know, start signals of coincidence events come from the 1275 keV nuclear photons (emitted almost simultaneously with the positrons), while stop signals come from the 511 keV annihilation photons.…”
Section: Spectrometer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated PAL spectra are created by LabVIEW random value generators (exponential, normal, and uniform distribution) according to the mathematical model of PAL spectra [1,18] and should be "perfect" without any distortion. But we can distort the spectra by adding kinds of "incorrect" coincidence events [13], or adjusting the time resolution function and its FWHM (full width at half maximum), zero-channel position, channel width, background rate, and so on. In experiments, the two sub-spectra (conventional and inverse) may have different parameter values, so the combined spectrum would be distorted even if the sub-spectra are "perfect".…”
Section: Symmetrical Pal Spectra Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the development of technology, several digital PAL spectrometers using fast oscilloscope or digitizer have been developed to replace nuclear instrumentation modules (NIM modules) such as the constant fraction discriminator (CFD) and the time-to-amplitude converter (TAC) [4][5][6][7]. In addition, recent studies developed a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) based PAL spectrometer that has many advantages over the conventional PAL spectrometer, which is configured with PMT [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%