2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling two approaches to critical success factors: The case of shared services in the public sector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the reasons for e‐Government success or failure are complex and vary from situation to situation, factor studies consistently emphasise the role of management and leadership. Managerial success factors for e‐Government include the importance of management support (Pardo & Scholl, ; Altameem et al ., ; Borman & Janssen, ), leadership (Kumar & Best, ; Altameem et al , ), clarity of vision (Altameem et al , ; Garson, ; Luk, ) and the development of shared common objectives (Lam, ; Gauld, ). It is suggested that IT implementation is made more complex in the public sector by relatively complex decision‐making and accountability systems, together with a plurality of stakeholders with many differing objectives (Almarabeh & AbuAli, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reasons for e‐Government success or failure are complex and vary from situation to situation, factor studies consistently emphasise the role of management and leadership. Managerial success factors for e‐Government include the importance of management support (Pardo & Scholl, ; Altameem et al ., ; Borman & Janssen, ), leadership (Kumar & Best, ; Altameem et al , ), clarity of vision (Altameem et al , ; Garson, ; Luk, ) and the development of shared common objectives (Lam, ; Gauld, ). It is suggested that IT implementation is made more complex in the public sector by relatively complex decision‐making and accountability systems, together with a plurality of stakeholders with many differing objectives (Almarabeh & AbuAli, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borman and Janssen [21] suggest that the "fundamental essence" of shared services is where a back office service such as accounts payable or foundational IT services is consolidated within a single area of an organization. Typically, they suggest, such a shared service "replaces arrangements where there is a duplication of efforts among business units" [21].…”
Section: Shared Services Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, they suggest, such a shared service "replaces arrangements where there is a duplication of efforts among business units" [21]. Blake [22] describes a shared services organization in terms of what it delivers -specialized, value-added services to an enterprise [22].…”
Section: Shared Services Definedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Managerial approaches look mainly at local practices of e-government, with a focus on efficiency and cost challenges (Madsen, Berger, & Phythian, 2014). Factors such as expertise, standardised processes, common IT applications, transaction-based services, and meeting user needs are found to be vital for the successful implementation of e-government, together with leadership, job redesign, and comprehensive training (Borman & Janssen, 2012;Borman & Janssen, 2013). Similarly, the evolutionary approach focuses on modelling development and on providing practice-oriented advice.…”
Section: The Challenge Of Integrating Icts Into Public Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%