2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty3245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling the quasar microlensing disc size problem with a wind model of active galactic nucleus

Abstract: Many analyses have concluded that the accretion disc sizes measured from the microlensing variability of quasars are larger than the expectations from the standard thin disc theory by a factor of ∼ 4. We propose a simply model by invoking a strong wind from the disc to flatten its radial temperature profile, which can then reconcile the size discrepancy problem. This wind model has been successfully applied to several microlensed quasars with a wind strength s 1.3 by only considering the inward decreasing of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is further supported by Pan-STARRS observations (Jiang et al 2017), which might, however, suffer from significant selection bias (see Appendix A of Homayouni et al 2019). Possible explanations involve alternative reprocessors, e.g., SSDs with powerful winds which have flatter disk temperature profiles (Li et al 2019;Sun et al 2019), SSDs with non-blackbody disk emission (Hall et al 2018), inhomogeneous SSDs with global temperature fluctuations (Cai et al 2020;Sun et al 2020a), or nondisk UV/optical continuum emission from the more extended broad-line clouds (Cackett et al 2018;Lawther et al 2018;Sun et al 2018a;Chelouche et al 2019;Korista & Goad 2019).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is further supported by Pan-STARRS observations (Jiang et al 2017), which might, however, suffer from significant selection bias (see Appendix A of Homayouni et al 2019). Possible explanations involve alternative reprocessors, e.g., SSDs with powerful winds which have flatter disk temperature profiles (Li et al 2019;Sun et al 2019), SSDs with non-blackbody disk emission (Hall et al 2018), inhomogeneous SSDs with global temperature fluctuations (Cai et al 2020;Sun et al 2020a), or nondisk UV/optical continuum emission from the more extended broad-line clouds (Cackett et al 2018;Lawther et al 2018;Sun et al 2018a;Chelouche et al 2019;Korista & Goad 2019).…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Alternatively, Sun et al (2019) (also see Li et al 2019) consider SSDs with powerful winds and find that such disks can have larger apparent sizes than the no-wind SSDs. Then, our results indicate that the disk-wind strength should decrease with increasing L, contradicting observations that luminous AGNs generally have stronger disk winds than their faint counterparts (e.g., Laor & Brandt 2002;Ganguly et al 2007).…”
Section: Implications For the X-ray Reprocessing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible explanation of the larger disk sizes is nonthermal disk emission caused by a low-density disk atmosphere (Hall et al 2018). Another explanation is a disk wind that leads to a higher effective temperature in the outer part of the accretion disk (e.g., Li et al 2019;Sun et al 2019). Gaskell (2017) found that the internal reddening of AGNs that leads to an underestimation of the far-UV luminosity can be an explanation of the discrepancy as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found that γ CSD around accreting BHs is usually in the range of ∼ 0.75 − 1.0 (Frank et al 1992;Yuan & Narayan 2014;Jiang et al 2014). But, an even shallower profile could be attributed to a disk wind (Li et al 2019;Sun et al 2019). To cover a wide range of The blue dashed (red solid) lines correspond to expanding (contracting) BBHs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%